Submit a comment

Plant-based enteral nutrition outperforms ultra-processed formulas in mitigating consequences of antibiotic-induced dysbiosis
Mona Chatrizeh, Jianmin Tian, Matthew Rogers, Firuz Feturi, Guojun Wu, Brian Firek, Roman Nikonov, Lauren Cass, Alexandra Sheppeck, Lavnish Ojha, Ali Carroll, Matthew Henkel, Justin Azar, Rajesh K. Aneja, Brian Campfield, Dennis Simon, Michael J. Morowitz
Mona Chatrizeh, Jianmin Tian, Matthew Rogers, Firuz Feturi, Guojun Wu, Brian Firek, Roman Nikonov, Lauren Cass, Alexandra Sheppeck, Lavnish Ojha, Ali Carroll, Matthew Henkel, Justin Azar, Rajesh K. Aneja, Brian Campfield, Dennis Simon, Michael J. Morowitz
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Gastroenterology Immunology

Plant-based enteral nutrition outperforms ultra-processed formulas in mitigating consequences of antibiotic-induced dysbiosis

Abstract

Malnutrition, gut inflammation, and antibiotic-induced dysbiosis are well-recognized risk factors for poor clinical outcomes among critically ill patients. We previously showed that commercially available plant-based enteral nutrition (PBEN) preserves a commensal microbiome compared with commonly used artificial enteral nutrition (AEN). In this study, PBEN was superior to AEN in promoting recovery from antibiotic-induced dysbiosis in mice and humans. PBEN effectively mitigated anemia and leukopenia, restored naive lymphocyte populations, and reduced bone marrow myeloid expansion. Animals randomized to PBEN also exhibited improved responses to infectious gastrointestinal challenges following antibiotic exposure. A pilot clinical study validated these findings, demonstrating increased gut commensals, reduced pathogens, and improved leukocyte balance in critically ill children receiving PBEN compared with AEN. Together, these results suggest that PBEN offers a practical dietary approach to mitigate antibiotic-associated complications and potentially improve clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients requiring supplemental nutrition.

Authors

Mona Chatrizeh, Jianmin Tian, Matthew Rogers, Firuz Feturi, Guojun Wu, Brian Firek, Roman Nikonov, Lauren Cass, Alexandra Sheppeck, Lavnish Ojha, Ali Carroll, Matthew Henkel, Justin Azar, Rajesh K. Aneja, Brian Campfield, Dennis Simon, Michael J. Morowitz

×

Guidelines

The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.

  • Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
  • Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
  • The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
  • No appeals will be considered.
  • Comments are not indexed in PubMed.

Specific requirements

  • Maximum length, 400 words
  • Entered as plain text or HTML
  • Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
  • Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
  • Comments may not include figures
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required