Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Resident macrophage subpopulations occupy distinct microenvironments in the kidney
Matthew D. Cheung, Elise N. Erman, Kyle H. Moore, Jeremie M.P. Lever, Zhang Li, Jennifer R. LaFontaine, Gelare Ghajar-Rahimi, Shanrun Liu, Zhengqin Yang, Rafay Karim, Bradley K. Yoder, Anupam Agarwal, James F. George
Matthew D. Cheung, Elise N. Erman, Kyle H. Moore, Jeremie M.P. Lever, Zhang Li, Jennifer R. LaFontaine, Gelare Ghajar-Rahimi, Shanrun Liu, Zhengqin Yang, Rafay Karim, Bradley K. Yoder, Anupam Agarwal, James F. George
View: Text | PDF
Resource and Technical Advance Immunology Nephrology

Resident macrophage subpopulations occupy distinct microenvironments in the kidney

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The kidney contains a population of resident macrophages from birth that expands as it grows and forms a contiguous network throughout the tissue. Kidney-resident macrophages (KRMs) are important in homeostasis and the response to acute kidney injury. While the kidney contains many microenvironments, it is unknown whether KRMs are a heterogeneous population differentiated by function and location. We combined single-cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq), spatial transcriptomics, flow cytometry, and immunofluorescence imaging to localize, characterize, and validate KRM populations during quiescence and following 19 minutes of bilateral ischemic kidney injury. scRNA-Seq and spatial transcriptomics revealed 7 distinct KRM subpopulations, which are organized into zones corresponding to regions of the nephron. Each subpopulation was identifiable by a unique transcriptomic signature, suggesting distinct functions. Specific protein markers were identified for 2 clusters, allowing analysis by flow cytometry or immunofluorescence imaging. Following injury, the original localization of each subpopulation was lost, either from changing locations or transcriptomic signatures. The original spatial distribution of KRMs was not fully restored for at least 28 days after injury. The change in KRM localization confirmed a long-hypothesized dysregulation of the local immune system following acute injury and may explain the increased risk for chronic kidney disease.

Authors

Matthew D. Cheung, Elise N. Erman, Kyle H. Moore, Jeremie M.P. Lever, Zhang Li, Jennifer R. LaFontaine, Gelare Ghajar-Rahimi, Shanrun Liu, Zhengqin Yang, Rafay Karim, Bradley K. Yoder, Anupam Agarwal, James F. George

×

Figure 4

Spatial validation of protein markers.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Spatial validation of protein markers.
(A) Spatial location of cluster 3...
(A) Spatial location of cluster 3 overlaid on the histological image and a dot plot of CD14 transcript expression for each cluster. (B) Kidneys were harvested and dissected to separate the cortex from the medulla to confirm the location of cluster 3 CD14++ cells in the medulla. Flow cytometry analysis of CD14 expression in KRMs of the whole kidney (left) and dissected cortex compared with medulla (right) along with the fluorescence minus one (FMO) control. (C) Spatial location of cluster 4 overlaid on histological image and a dot plot of Mrc1 transcript expression show that cluster 4 is localized in the outer cortex and inner medulla but not the inner cortex. (D) Representative images from immunofluorescence of kidney sections of Cx3Cr1 GFP+/– mice stained with CD206 and the nuclear stain DAPI to validate cluster 4 KRMs by confocal microscopy (original magnification, ×40). Results were averaged from 4 separate fields within each area with 4 mice in total over 2 independent experiments. Scale bar: 20 μm. (E) Quantitation from a blinded observer of CD206+ KRMs in the outer cortex, inner cortex, and medulla, expressed as a proportion of Cx3Cr1+ cells. ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts