Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Heterologous versus homologous boosting elicits qualitatively distinct, BA.5–cross-reactive T cells in transplant recipients
Elizabeth A. Thompson, Wabathi Ngecu, Laila Stoddart, Trevor S. Johnston, Amy Chang, Katherine Cascino, Jennifer L. Alejo, Aura T. Abedon, Hady Samaha, Nadine Rouphael, Aaron A.R. Tobian, Dorry L. Segev, William A. Werbel, Andrew H. Karaba, Joel N. Blankson, Andrea L. Cox
Elizabeth A. Thompson, Wabathi Ngecu, Laila Stoddart, Trevor S. Johnston, Amy Chang, Katherine Cascino, Jennifer L. Alejo, Aura T. Abedon, Hady Samaha, Nadine Rouphael, Aaron A.R. Tobian, Dorry L. Segev, William A. Werbel, Andrew H. Karaba, Joel N. Blankson, Andrea L. Cox
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health COVID-19 Vaccines

Heterologous versus homologous boosting elicits qualitatively distinct, BA.5–cross-reactive T cells in transplant recipients

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Background The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 subvariant escapes vaccination-induced neutralizing antibodies because of mutations in the spike (S) protein. Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) develop high COVID-19 morbidity and poor Omicron variant recognition after COVID-19 vaccination. T cell responses may provide a second line of defense. Therefore, understanding which vaccine regimens induce robust, conserved T cell responses is critical.Methods We evaluated anti-S IgG titers, subvariant pseudo-neutralization, and S-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses from SOTRs in a national, prospective, observational trial (n = 75). Participants were selected if they received 3 doses of mRNA (homologous boosting) or 2 doses of mRNA followed by Ad26.COV2.S (heterologous boosting).Results Homologous boosting with 3 mRNA doses induced the highest anti-S IgG titers. However, antibodies induced by both vaccine regimens demonstrated lower pseudo-neutralization against BA.5 compared with the ancestral strain. In contrast, vaccine-induced S-specific T cells maintained cross-reactivity against BA.5 compared with ancestral recognition. Homologous boosting induced higher frequencies of activated polyfunctional CD4+ T cell responses, with polyfunctional IL-21+ peripheral T follicular helper cells increased in mRNA-1273 compared with BNT162b2. IL-21+ cells correlated with antibody titers. Heterologous boosting with Ad26.COV2.S did not increase CD8+ responses compared to homologous boosting.Conclusion Boosting with the ancestral strain can induce cross-reactive T cell responses against emerging variants in SOTRs, but alternative vaccine strategies are required to induce robust CD8+ T cell responses.Funding Ben-Dov Family; NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) K24AI144954, NIAID K08AI156021, NIAID K23AI157893, NIAID U01AI138897, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases T32DK007713, and National Cancer Institute 1U54CA260492; Johns Hopkins Vice Dean of Research Support for COVID-19 Research in Immunopathogenesis; and Emory COVID-19 research repository.

Authors

Elizabeth A. Thompson, Wabathi Ngecu, Laila Stoddart, Trevor S. Johnston, Amy Chang, Katherine Cascino, Jennifer L. Alejo, Aura T. Abedon, Hady Samaha, Nadine Rouphael, Aaron A.R. Tobian, Dorry L. Segev, William A. Werbel, Andrew H. Karaba, Joel N. Blankson, Andrea L. Cox

×

Figure 4

Increased polyfunctional CD4+ T cells following mRNA boost.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Increased polyfunctional CD4+ T cells following mRNA boost.
Spike protei...
Spike protein–specific T cell responses were evaluated in participants who received 2 doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine followed by adenoviral vector boost (Ad boost, blue, n = 40) or a third mRNA dose (mRNA boost, red, n = 35). Polyfunctionality of the memory CD4+ or CD8 T cell responses. Pie charts show the fraction of total cytokine response comprising any combination of IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF, or IL-21. Pie arcs show the proportion making each cytokine as annotated. (A) Comparison of CD4+ response to ancestral or BA.5 peptides, regardless of boosting regimen. (B) Comparison of CD4+ response against BA.5 peptides, stratified by boosting regimen. (C) Overview of CD4+ response against BA.5 peptides, with percentage of total memory CD4+ T cells shown for individual polyfunctional categories. Significance tested using the Wilcoxon ranked test as calculated in SPICE v6. (D) Comparison of CD8+ response to ancestral or BA.5 peptides, regardless of boosting regimen. (E) Comparison of CD8+ response against BA.5 peptides, segregated by boosting regimen. (F) Overview of CD8+ response against BA.5 peptides with percentage of total memory CD8+ T cells shown for individual polyfunctional categories. Significance tested using the Wilcoxon ranked test as calculated in SPICE v6.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts