Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Residency matches of MD-PhD versus MD-only students: compatibility with continued research momentum
Shannon Baker, S. Mehdi Nouraie, Richard A. Steinman
Shannon Baker, S. Mehdi Nouraie, Richard A. Steinman
View: Text | PDF
Physician-Scientist Development

Residency matches of MD-PhD versus MD-only students: compatibility with continued research momentum

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Programs at the medical school level to train students as physician-scientists include NIH-supported MD-PhD (Medical Scientist Training Program, MSTP), non–NIH-supported MD-PhD (MDPhD), and limited research pathways for MD-only students. Continued exposure to a research-rich culture in residency could sustain commitment to a physician-scientist career. We compared residency matches of 10,668 MSTP, MDPhD, or MD-only students from 2021–2023 match cycles, using the NIH funding level of the matched residency program’s department in the match year as the central measure. We also measured how medical school NIH funding levels influenced student matches to top-funded residency programs. Public individual-level match data were available from 13 top-NIH-funded medical schools (top quintile, highest 20% funding) and 8 mid-NIH-funded medical schools (mid quintile, 40%–60% funding). Top-quintile medical schools housed only MSTP programs, whereas mid-quintile schools had both MSTP and MDPhD programs. Across all medical schools, MSTP students matched at a higher rate than MD-only students to residencies in top-NIH-funded departments in their discipline. Within the mid-quintile schools, MSTP and MDPhD student matches did not differ significantly. Notably, students from the top-quintile medical schools (both MD-only and MSTP) matched to higher-NIH-funded residency departments than comparably trained students from the mid-quintile schools.

Authors

Shannon Baker, S. Mehdi Nouraie, Richard A. Steinman

×

Figure 1

Residency matches of individual students, 2021–2023, by medical school training program.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Residency matches of individual students, 2021–2023, by medical school t...
Each dot is a student in the indicated training program (total students/program in parentheses). The y axis represents the NIH funding level of each student’s matched residency program within the matched specialty. Higher values indicate more NIH funding within the matched specialty department (e.g., if the residency that a student matched into was in the 20th percentile of funding for that specialty, then the NIH funding is shown as 100 – percentile = 80). Students who matched to programs that did not make the Blue Ridge Institute listing for funding for the specialty in that match year are denoted as “No NIH funding” (see text). The red bar indicates the median for all student matches. For MSTP versus MD, P < 0.0001; for MDPhD versus MD, P < 0.0001; and for MSTP versus MDPhD, P = 0.59, using a linear mixed effects model with percentile as a continuous variable and year adjustment (see Table 3).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts