Usage Information

Effect of tolerance versus chronic immunosuppression protocols on the quality of life of kidney transplant recipients
Maria Lucia L. Madariaga, Philip J. Spencer, Kumaran Shanmugarajah, Kerry A. Crisalli, David C. Chang, James F. Markmann, Nahel Elias, A. Benedict Cosimi, David H. Sachs, Tatsuo Kawai
Maria Lucia L. Madariaga, Philip J. Spencer, Kumaran Shanmugarajah, Kerry A. Crisalli, David C. Chang, James F. Markmann, Nahel Elias, A. Benedict Cosimi, David H. Sachs, Tatsuo Kawai
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Immunology Transplantation

Effect of tolerance versus chronic immunosuppression protocols on the quality of life of kidney transplant recipients

Abstract

Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

BACKGROUND. Kidney transplant patients on tolerance protocols avoid the morbidity associated with the use of conventional chronic immunosuppressive regimens. However, the impact of tolerance versus conventional regimens on the quality of life (QOL) of kidney transplant patients is unknown.

METHODS. Five patients who achieved long-term immunosuppression-free renal allograft survival after combined kidney and bone marrow transplantation (tolerant group) were compared with thirty-two comparable kidney transplant recipients on conventional immunosuppression (conventional group). QOL was compared with 16 conventional recipients using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form 36 (KDQOL SF-36) and the Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale (MTSOSD-59R).

RESULTS. Patients in the tolerant group required significantly less treatment after transplant for hypertension and no medications for diabetes (P < 0.01). There was no incidence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, or malignancies in the tolerant group, while these were observed in 12.5%, 40.6%, and 11.8% of the conventional group, respectively. Tolerant patients experienced better overall health (P < 0.01) and scored higher on kidney transplant-targeted scales and healthy survey scales than patients in the conventional group according to the KDQOL SF-36 (P < 0.05). Tolerant patients were less likely to experience depression, dyspnea, excessive appetite/thirst, flatulence, hearing loss, itching, joint pain, lack of energy, muscle cramps, and lack of libido than conventional patients according to the MTSOSD-59R (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION. Kidney transplant recipients who achieved tolerance experience significantly fewer incidences of complications, improved QOL, and fewer comorbid symptoms compared with patients on conventional immunosuppression. These results support the expanded use of tolerance protocols in kidney transplantation.

Authors

Maria Lucia L. Madariaga, Philip J. Spencer, Kumaran Shanmugarajah, Kerry A. Crisalli, David C. Chang, James F. Markmann, Nahel Elias, A. Benedict Cosimi, David H. Sachs, Tatsuo Kawai

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2025 through May 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 1,406 87
PDF 210 8
Table 181 0
Citation downloads 190 0
Totals 1,987 95
Total Views 2,082
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement