Submit a comment
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Current dosing of intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) in adults with complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPE)/empyema is empiric, as dose-escalation trials have not previously been conducted. We hypothesized that LTI-01 (a single-chain urokinase [scuPA]), which is relatively resistant to plasminogen activator inhibitor–1 (PAI-1), would be well tolerated.METHODS. This was an open-label, dose-escalation trial of LTI-01 IPFT at 50,000-800,000 IU daily for up to 3 days in adults with loculated CPE/empyema and failed pleural drainage. The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability, and secondary objectives included assessments of processing and bioactivity of scuPA in blood and pleural fluid (PF), and early efficacy.RESULTS. LTI-01 was well tolerated, with no bleeding, treatment-emergent adverse events, or surgical referrals (n = 14 subjects). Urokinase PA (uPA) antigen increased in PFs at 3 hours after LTI-01 (P < 0.01) but not in plasma. PF saturated active PAI-1, generated PAI-1–resistant bioactive complexes, and increased PA and fibrinolytic activities and D-dimers. There was no systemic fibrinogenolysis or increments in plasma D-dimers. Decreased pleural opacities occurred in all but 1 subject. Both subjects receiving 800,000 IU required 2 doses to relieve pleural sepsis, with 2 other subjects similarly responding at lower doses.CONCLUSION. LTI-01 IPFT was well tolerated at these doses, with no safety concerns. Bioactivity of LTI-01 IPFT was confirmed, limited to PFs, where its processing simulated that previously reported in preclinical studies. Preliminary efficacy signals including reduction of pleural opacity were observed.TRIAL REGISTRATION. ANZCT ID: ACTRN12616001442493.FUNDING. Lung Therapeutics Inc. (LTI), NIH SMARTT HHSN268201100014C (SI), UO-1 HL121841-01A1 (SI). 1R01HL130402-01A1 (AAK, GF, SI), UTHSCT AG18-09 (AAK).
Authors
Lutz Beckert, Ben Brockway, Graham Simpson, Anne Marie Southcott, Y.C. Gary Lee, Najib Rahman, Richard W. Light, Steven Shoemaker, John Gillies, Andrey A. Komissarov, Galina Florova, Timothy Ochran, William Bradley, Harrison Ndetan, Karan P. Singh, Krishna Sarva, Steven Idell
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
