Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Submit a comment

Spatial N-Glycan Imaging and Machine Learning Classify Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Predict Glutamine Synthetase Status
Muhammed F. Bayram, Jade K. Macdonald, Andrew DelaCourt, Peggi M. Angel, Richard R. Drake, Aatur Singhi, David Geller, Satdarshan P. Monga, Amit Singal, Anand Mehta
Muhammed F. Bayram, Jade K. Macdonald, Andrew DelaCourt, Peggi M. Angel, Richard R. Drake, Aatur Singhi, David Geller, Satdarshan P. Monga, Amit Singal, Anand Mehta
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health In-Press Preview Clinical Research Hepatology Oncology

Spatial N-Glycan Imaging and Machine Learning Classify Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Predict Glutamine Synthetase Status

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exhibits molecular heterogeneity that challenges histopathologic classification and biomarker discovery. We assessed whether spatially resolved N-glycan imaging with machine learning could classify tumor regions and infer glutamine synthetase (GS) status. METHODS. In this retrospective study, MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of N-glycans was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections from two independent cohorts (discovery, n = 88; validation, n = 60) with pathologist annotation. An XGBoost classifier was trained on 90 discriminative N-glycan features using patient-grouped cross-validation. Performance was assessed by AUC for pixel- and biopsy-level discrimination of tumor from adjacent non-tumor tissue, and for GS status classification. RESULTS. Pixel-level AUCs were 0.95 (cross-validation) and 0.89 (external validation); biopsy-level AUCs were 1.0 and 0.97, correctly identifying 97% of tumor-containing biopsies. Probability maps recapitulated pathologist-defined boundaries; UMAP embeddings captured inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity. Discriminative species (m/z 2393.846, 1905.634, 1743.579, 1809.639) reflected complex, fucosylated, branched remodeling. N-glycans bearing six GlcNAc residues were enriched in GS+ (n = 45) versus GS− (n = 17) tumors (P = 0.001) and discriminated GS status (AUC = 0.75), consistent with GLUL and MGAT5 upregulation in TCGA-LIHC. CONCLUSION. MALDI N-glycan imaging with machine learning enables spatially resolved, objective classification of HCC and links glycan phenotypes to tumor-associated metabolic programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION. Not applicable; retrospective analysis of archival, de-identified tissue. FUNDING. NIH/NCI R01CA285370, 1R01CA289381, R33CA267226, R01CA282022, R21CA263464, R21CA286287, R01CA253460, S10OD030212, R01CA251155, R01CA250227, U01CA271887, P50CA295495, P30CA138313, P20GM130457, P30DK123704, P30DK120531,R24DK139775; NIH/NIA R01AG078702; Smart State Endowment, State of South Carolina; LeDucq Foundation.

Authors

Muhammed F. Bayram, Jade K. Macdonald, Andrew DelaCourt, Peggi M. Angel, Richard R. Drake, Aatur Singhi, David Geller, Satdarshan P. Monga, Amit Singal, Anand Mehta

×

Guidelines

The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.

  • Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
  • Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
  • The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
  • No appeals will be considered.
  • Comments are not indexed in PubMed.

Specific requirements

  • Maximum length, 400 words
  • Entered as plain text or HTML
  • Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
  • Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
  • Comments may not include figures
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts