Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Combination of PD-L1 and PVR determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade
Bo Ryeong Lee, Sehyun Chae, Jihyun Moon, Myeong Joon Kim, Hankyu Lee, Hyuk Wan Ko, Byoung Chul Cho, Hyo Sup Shim, Daehee Hwang, Hye Ryun Kim, Sang-Jun Ha
Bo Ryeong Lee, Sehyun Chae, Jihyun Moon, Myeong Joon Kim, Hankyu Lee, Hyuk Wan Ko, Byoung Chul Cho, Hyo Sup Shim, Daehee Hwang, Hye Ryun Kim, Sang-Jun Ha
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Combination of PD-L1 and PVR determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Expression of immune checkpoint ligands (ICLs) is necessary to trigger the inhibitory signal via immune checkpoint receptors (ICRs) in exhausted T cells under tumor immune microenvironment. Nevertheless,to our knowledge, ICL expression profile in cancer patients has not been investigated. Using previously reported RNA-seq data sets, we found that expression of ICLs was patient specific but their coexpression can be patterned in non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Since the expression of PD-L1 and poliovirus receptor (PVR) among various ICLs was independently regulated, we could stratify the patients who were treated with anti–PD-1 later into 4 groups according to the expression level of PD-L1 and PVR. Of interest, high PVR and low PVR expressions in PD-L1–expressing patients enriched nonresponders and responders to PD-1 blockade, respectively, helping in further selection of responders. Using a genetically engineered cancer model, we also found that PVR-deficient and PD-L1–sufficient tumor-bearing mice were highly sensitive to anti–PD-1 therapy, whereas PVR-sufficient and PD-L1–deficient tumor-bearing mice were resistant to anti–PD-1 therapy. Taken together, our study provides a concept that combinatorial expression patterns of PVR and PD-L1 are key determinants for PD-1 blockade and furthermore suggest a better therapeutic usage of immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs).

Authors

Bo Ryeong Lee, Sehyun Chae, Jihyun Moon, Myeong Joon Kim, Hankyu Lee, Hyuk Wan Ko, Byoung Chul Cho, Hyo Sup Shim, Daehee Hwang, Hye Ryun Kim, Sang-Jun Ha

×

Figure 3

PD-L1 and PVR promote tumor growth by differentially modulating tumor-infiltrating immune cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
PD-L1 and PVR promote tumor growth by differentially modulating tumor-in...
(A) PD-L1– or/and PVR-deficient MC38 tumor cells were generated from parental WT MC38 and expression of PD-L1 and PVR was assessed by flow cytometry. (B and C) B6 mice were injected s.c. with WT (black), PD-L1–KO (red), PVR-KO (blue), or dKO (purple) MC38 tumor cells (1 × 105 cells each, n = 8 per group). Tumor growth (B) and survival (C) of each tumor-bearing mouse. Numbers in parentheses denote the tumor-free mice/total mice on day 49 after transplantation. The data are represented as the mean ± SEM and are representative of 2 independent experiments. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 by multivariate Wilcoxon with multiple comparison test. (D–H) Once established (100–200 mm3), each tumor harvested from WT (black, n = 8), PD-L1–KO (red, n = 10), or PVR-KO (blue, n = 10) MC38-bearing mice was analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative FACS plots (D) and frequency of CD8+ T cells (E) or CD4+ T cells (F) among CD45+ cells in tumors. Representative FACS plots (G) and frequency of CD4+Foxp3+CD25hi Tregs (H) among CD45+CD4+ T cells. (I) The ratio of CD8+ T cells/Tregs in harvested tumors. (J–L) CD8+ T cells in each harvested tumor were ex vivo stimulated with or without MC38 epitope peptide (p15E, KSPWFTTL). Representative FACS plots (J) and frequency of IFN-γ+ cells among CD8+ T cells (K) and IFN-γ+ CD8+ T cells (L) in each tumor type. The data are represented as the mean ± SEM with each dot indicating 1 mouse. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; and ***P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts