Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis and treatment is ineffective in macaque and hamster SARS-CoV-2 disease models
Kyle Rosenke, Michael A. Jarvis, Friederike Feldmann, Benjamin Schwarz, Atsushi Okumura, Jamie Lovaglio, Greg Saturday, Patrick W. Hanley, Kimberly Meade-White, Brandi N. Williamson, Frederick Hansen, Lizette Perez-Perez, Shanna Leventhal, Tsing-Lee Tang-Huau, Julie Callison, Elaine Haddock, Kaitlin A. Stromberg, Dana Scott, Graham Sewell, Catharine M. Bosio, David Hawman, Emmie de Wit, Heinz Feldmann
Kyle Rosenke, Michael A. Jarvis, Friederike Feldmann, Benjamin Schwarz, Atsushi Okumura, Jamie Lovaglio, Greg Saturday, Patrick W. Hanley, Kimberly Meade-White, Brandi N. Williamson, Frederick Hansen, Lizette Perez-Perez, Shanna Leventhal, Tsing-Lee Tang-Huau, Julie Callison, Elaine Haddock, Kaitlin A. Stromberg, Dana Scott, Graham Sewell, Catharine M. Bosio, David Hawman, Emmie de Wit, Heinz Feldmann
View: Text | PDF
Research Article COVID-19 Therapeutics

Hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis and treatment is ineffective in macaque and hamster SARS-CoV-2 disease models

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

We remain largely without effective prophylactic/therapeutic interventions for COVID-19. Although many human COVID-19 clinical trials are ongoing, there remains a deficiency of supportive preclinical drug efficacy studies to help guide decisions. Here we assessed the prophylactic/therapeutic efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a drug of interest for COVID-19 management, in 2 animal disease models. The standard human malaria HCQ prophylaxis (6.5 mg/kg given weekly) and treatment (6.5 mg/kg given daily) did not significantly benefit clinical outcome, nor did it reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication/shedding in the upper and lower respiratory tract in the rhesus macaque disease model. Similarly, when used for prophylaxis or treatment, neither the standard human malaria dose (6.5 mg/kg) nor a high dose (50 mg/kg) of HCQ had any beneficial effect on clinical disease or SARS-CoV-2 kinetics (replication/shedding) in the Syrian hamster disease model. Results from these 2 preclinical animal models may prove helpful in guiding clinical use of HCQ for prophylaxis/treatment of COVID-19.

Authors

Kyle Rosenke, Michael A. Jarvis, Friederike Feldmann, Benjamin Schwarz, Atsushi Okumura, Jamie Lovaglio, Greg Saturday, Patrick W. Hanley, Kimberly Meade-White, Brandi N. Williamson, Frederick Hansen, Lizette Perez-Perez, Shanna Leventhal, Tsing-Lee Tang-Huau, Julie Callison, Elaine Haddock, Kaitlin A. Stromberg, Dana Scott, Graham Sewell, Catharine M. Bosio, David Hawman, Emmie de Wit, Heinz Feldmann

×

Figure 5

Syrian hamster model — viral shedding, viral load and pathology.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Syrian hamster model — viral shedding, viral load and pathology.
Hamster...
Hamsters were infected with SARS-CoV-2 by the intranasal route (I). (A) HCQ (T) was administered either prophylactically 1 time at 24 hours before infection (6.5 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg) or as a treatment starting 1 hour after infection and continuing every 24 hours for 3 consecutive days (6.5 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg). Hamsters were scored for clinical signs daily and swabs (oral and rectal) were collected 48 and 96 hours after infection (S). Animals were euthanized on day 4 and lungs were harvested for pathology and virology. Swab and lung loads were determined by qRT-PCR. (B and C) Viral shedding. Oral and rectal swabs collected on days 2 and 4 were analyzed for viral genome copies by qRT-PCR. (D) Percent weight change. Hamsters were weighed daily as a parameter to measure disease progression. Daily weights were compared with starting weights to generate a percent change. (E) Viral load in lung tissue. Lung viral loads (E assay, genome copies) were determined as a correlate for lower respiratory tract infection. (F) Infectious lung titers. Lung samples were titrated for infectious virus. No statistical significance was found between the groups presented in parts B–F. (G) Lung-to-body weight ratio. Lung-to-body weight ratio was determined as an indicator for pneumonia with lung edema. Statistically significant differences were found only when compared with lung-to-body weight ratios of naive hamsters. SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; qRT-PCR, quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts