Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Immune cells and their inflammatory mediators modify β cells and cause checkpoint inhibitor–induced diabetes
Ana Luisa Perdigoto, Songyan Deng, Katherine C. Du, Manik Kuchroo, Daniel B. Burkhardt, Alexander Tong, Gary Israel, Marie E. Robert, Stuart P. Weisberg, Nancy Kirkiles-Smith, Angeliki M. Stamatouli, Harriet M. Kluger, Zoe Quandt, Arabella Young, Mei-Ling Yang, Mark J. Mamula, Jordan S. Pober, Mark S. Anderson, Smita Krishnaswamy, Kevan C. Herold
Ana Luisa Perdigoto, Songyan Deng, Katherine C. Du, Manik Kuchroo, Daniel B. Burkhardt, Alexander Tong, Gary Israel, Marie E. Robert, Stuart P. Weisberg, Nancy Kirkiles-Smith, Angeliki M. Stamatouli, Harriet M. Kluger, Zoe Quandt, Arabella Young, Mei-Ling Yang, Mark J. Mamula, Jordan S. Pober, Mark S. Anderson, Smita Krishnaswamy, Kevan C. Herold
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Immune cells and their inflammatory mediators modify β cells and cause checkpoint inhibitor–induced diabetes

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have revolutionized cancer treatment but can trigger autoimmune complications, including CPI-induced diabetes mellitus (CPI-DM), which occurs preferentially with PD-1 blockade. We found evidence of pancreatic inflammation in patients with CPI-DM with shrinkage of pancreases, increased pancreatic enzymes, and in a case from a patient who died with CPI-DM, peri-islet lymphocytic infiltration. In the NOD mouse model, anti–PD-L1 but not anti–CTLA-4 induced diabetes rapidly. RNA sequencing revealed that cytolytic IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells infiltrated islets with anti–PD-L1. Changes in β cells were predominantly driven by IFN-γ and TNF-α and included induction of a potentially novel β cell population with transcriptional changes suggesting dedifferentiation. IFN-γ increased checkpoint ligand expression and activated apoptosis pathways in human β cells in vitro. Treatment with anti–IFN-γ and anti–TNF-α prevented CPI-DM in anti–PD-L1–treated NOD mice. CPIs targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway resulted in transcriptional changes in β cells and immune infiltrates that may lead to the development of diabetes. Inhibition of inflammatory cytokines can prevent CPI-DM, suggesting a strategy for clinical application to prevent this complication.

Authors

Ana Luisa Perdigoto, Songyan Deng, Katherine C. Du, Manik Kuchroo, Daniel B. Burkhardt, Alexander Tong, Gary Israel, Marie E. Robert, Stuart P. Weisberg, Nancy Kirkiles-Smith, Angeliki M. Stamatouli, Harriet M. Kluger, Zoe Quandt, Arabella Young, Mei-Ling Yang, Mark J. Mamula, Jordan S. Pober, Mark S. Anderson, Smita Krishnaswamy, Kevan C. Herold

×

Figure 3

Single-cell RNA-Seq of CD8+ T cells from anti–PD-L1 versus anti–CTLA-4 mAb–treated NOD mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Single-cell RNA-Seq of CD8+ T cells from anti–PD-L1 versus anti–CTLA-4 m...
(A) NOD mice at 7 weeks old treated with anti–PD-L1 (n = 11) rapidly develop diabetes whereas anti–CTLA-4–treated mice (n = 11) and age-matched control NOD mice (n = 4) do not. (P = 0.002, log-rank test [Mantel-Cox test].) (B) Immune and islet cell populations were identified by Multiscale PHATE analysis. (C) Multiscale PHATE analysis highlighting T cells (CD3E+) from all 14,892 cells treated with anti–CTLA-4 and anti–PD-L1. (D) Among the CD3E+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells are present in the islets from anti–CTLA-4– and anti–PD-L1–treated mice. (E) MELD analysis of T cells indicating that differences in CD8+ T cells were associated with anti–PD-L1 versus anti–CTLA-4 mAb treatment. (F) Metascape analysis of differentially expressed genes (1,039 genes with P < 0.05, q < 0.05, log2fc ≤ –0.6 and ≥ 0.6) between CD8+ T cells from anti–PD-L1 or anti–CTLA-4 mAb–treated mice revealed differences in pathways regulating cell cycle, responses to IFN-γ, apoptosis/cell killing, and cytokine production. (G) Diseases and functions predicted to be impacted with CPI treatment in CD8+ T cells by IPA. Predicted activation state is for anti–PD-L1 CD8+ T cells compared with anti–CTLA-4 CD8+ T cells. Activation z score cutoffs ≤ –2 and ≥ 2. (H) Select differentially expressed genes in CD8+ T cells consistent with a cytotoxic phenotype with anti–PD-L1 treatment. Cxcr3, Ifng, Pdcd1, Gzmb/a, and Fasl were among those genes elevated in CD8+ T cells in anti–PD-L1–treated mice. Volcano plot includes 2,007 genes based on P < 0.05, q < 0.05, log2fc ≤ –0.6 and ≥ 0.6 with genes of interest highlighted in red or blue. log2fc, log2 fold change.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts