BACKGROUND Alcohol use disorder has a detrimental impact on global health and new treatment targets are needed. Preclinical studies show attenuating effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists on addiction-related behaviors in rodents and nonhuman primates. Some trials have shown an effect of GLP-1 agonism on reward processes in humans; however, results from clinical studies remain inconclusive.METHODS This is a predefined secondary analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the GLP-1 agonist dulaglutide as a therapy for smoking cessation. The main objective was to assess differences in alcohol consumption after 12 weeks of treatment with dulaglutide compared to placebo. The effect of dulaglutide on alcohol consumption was analyzed using a multivariable generalized linear model.RESULTS In the primary analysis, participants out of the cohort (n = 255) who reported drinking alcohol at baseline and who completed 12 weeks of treatment (n = 151; placebo n = 75, dulaglutide n = 76) were included. The median age was 42 (IQR 33–53) with 61% (n = 92) females. At week 12, participants receiving dulaglutide drank 29% less (relative effect = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52–0.97, P = 0.04) than participants receiving placebo. Changes in alcohol consumption were not correlated with smoking status at week 12.CONCLUSION These results provide evidence that dulaglutide reduces alcohol intake in humans and contribute to the growing body of literature promoting the use of GLP-1 agonists in treatment of substance use disorders.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03204396.FUNDING Swiss National Foundation, Gottfried Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation, Goldschmidt-Jacobson Foundation, Hemmi Foundation, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Swiss Academy of Medical Science.
Leila Probst, Sophie Monnerat, Deborah R. Vogt, Sophia Lengsfeld, Thilo Burkard, Andrea Meienberg, Cemile Bathelt, Mirjam Christ-Crain, Bettina Winzeler
Usage data is cumulative from August 2025 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 4,001 | 843 |
| 448 | 217 | |
| Figure | 709 | 0 |
| Table | 152 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 537 | 30 |
| Citation downloads | 368 | 0 |
| Totals | 6,215 | 1,090 |
| Total Views | 7,305 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.