Usage Information
Abstract
Gas flow is fundamental for driving tidal ventilation and, thus, the speed of lung motion, but current bias flow settings to support the preterm lung after birth do not have an evidence base. We aimed to determine the role of gas bias flow rates to generate positive pressure ventilation in initiating early lung injury pathways in the preterm lamb. Using slower speeds to inflate the lung during tidal ventilation (gas flow rates 4–6 L/min) did not affect lung mechanics, mechanical power, or gas exchange compared with those currently used in clinical practice (8–10 L/min). Speed of pressure and volume change during inflation were faster with higher flow rates. Lower flow rates resulted in less bronchoalveolar fluid protein, better lung morphology, and fewer detached epithelial cells. Overall, relative to unventilated fetal controls, there was greater protein change using 8-10 L/min, which was associated with enrichment of acute inflammatory and innate responses. Slowing the speed of lung motion by supporting the preterm lung from birth with lower flow rates than in current clinical use resulted in less lung injury without compromising tidal ventilation or gas exchange.
Authors
David G. Tingay, Monique Fatmous, Kelly Kenna, Jack Chapman, Ellen Douglas, Arun Sett, Qi Hui Poh, Sophia I. Dahm, Tuyen Kim Quach, Magdy Sourial, Haoyun Fang, David W. Greening, Prue M. Pereira-Fantini
Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,349 | 54 |
| 240 | 36 | |
| Figure | 911 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 257 | 5 |
| Citation downloads | 208 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,965 | 95 |
| Total Views | 3,060 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
