Usage Information
Abstract
Successful allograft-specific tolerance induction would eliminate the need for daily immunosuppression and improve posttransplant quality of life. Adoptive cell therapy with regulatory T cells expressing donor-specific chimeric antigen receptors (CAR Tregs) is a promising strategy but, as monotherapy, cannot prolong survival with allografts with multiple MHC mismatches. Using an HLA-A2–transgenic haplo-mismatched heart transplantation model in immunocompetent C57BL/6 recipients, we showed that HLA-A2–specific CAR (A2.CAR) Tregs were able to synergize with a low dose of anti-CD154 to enhance graft survival. Using haplo-mismatched grafts expressing the 2W-OVA transgene and tetramer-based tracking of 2W- and OVA-specific T cells, we showed that in mice with accepted grafts, A2.CAR Tregs inhibited donor-specific T cell, B cell, and antibody responses and promoted a substantial increase in endogenous FOXP3+ Tregs with indirect donor specificity. By contrast, in mice where A2.CAR Tregs failed to prolong graft survival, FOXP3– A2.CAR T cells preferentially accumulated in rejecting allografts, and endogenous donor-specific responses were not controlled. This study therefore provides evidence for synergy between A2.CAR Tregs and CD154 blockade to promote infectious tolerance in immunocompetent recipients of haplo-mismatched heart grafts and defines features of A2.CAR Tregs when they fail to reshape host immunity toward allograft tolerance.
Authors
Samarth S. Durgam, Isaac Rosado-Sánchez, Dengping Yin, Madeleine Speck, Majid Mojibian, Ismail Sayin, Grace E. Hynes, Maria-Luisa Alegre, Megan K. Levings, Anita S. Chong
Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,516 | 652 |
| 566 | 232 | |
| Figure | 1,022 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 350 | 37 |
| Citation downloads | 294 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,748 | 921 |
| Total Views | 6,669 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
