Usage Information
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) causes severe morbidity and early mortality, yet it varies phenotypically. Both air pollution and SCD affect the cardiorespiratory, inflammatory, and endothelial systems; however, limited evidence exists on the effect of long-term air pollution exposure in SCD. We hypothesized that annual ambient (outdoor) concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), particles with a diameter of 2.5 μm or less, at a child’s home would be significantly associated with worse clinical, laboratory, and stroke-risk imaging outcomes. Patient data for this retrospective study were obtained from a cohort of children with SCD (from 2010 to 2019). Annual PM2.5 exposure was estimated using remote-sensing air pollution datasets. Statistical analyses employed fixed effects multivariable models, offering a robust approach to isolate the effect of PM2.5 exposure. The final cohort included 1,089 children with SCD. Higher annual PM2.5 concentrations were significantly associated with more annual hospital days, higher likelihood of hospitalization and abnormal stroke-risk screening, and elevated inflammatory markers. Of note, hydroxyurea use mitigated the inflammatory response to PM2.5 but did not mitigate the effect of PM2.5 on clinical outcomes. Importantly, the elevated stroke risk associated with PM2.5 exposure persisted, even among children receiving hydroxyurea therapy, highlighting a critical concern in pediatric SCD management. These results underscore the clinical importance of addressing environmental factors for comprehensive SCD care.
Authors
Paul E. George, Grace Kalmus, Joseph Lipscomb, David H. Howard, Benjamin Kopp, Wilbur A. Lam, Stefanie Ebelt
Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,509 | 155 |
| 508 | 33 | |
| Figure | 597 | 0 |
| Table | 104 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 500 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 247 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,465 | 188 |
| Total Views | 4,653 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
