Usage Information
Abstract
Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection is a well-described phenomenon for several viruses, including dengue, Ebola, respiratory syncytial virus, and HIV. ADE occurs when virus-antibody complexes engage Fc receptors (FcRs) and virus-specific receptors, enhancing infection under conditions of incomplete neutralization. The Coronavirus Immunotherapeutic Consortium (CoVIC) assembled a comprehensive dataset of functional properties for over 400 mAbs, enabling direct comparison of neutralization, Fc-mediated functions, receptor binding, and infection of immune cells. Infection rates in most primary human immune cell types were low, with modest increases observed for some mAbs. In contrast, macrophages were more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 and exhibited substantial ADE with select mAbs. ADE was completely inhibited by FcR blockade and significantly reduced by antibody- or ceftazidime-mediated blocking of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Neutralization potency did not correlate with ADE, as both strongly and weakly neutralizing antibodies induced enhancement. Instead, ADE magnitude depended on an antibody’s ability to block spike protein binding to ACE2. Importantly, ADE resulted in productive infection with release of infectious virus. Evaluation of antibodies against the BA.1 (Omicron) variant revealed reduced or lost ADE for most mAbs, with increased ADE observed for several mAbs relative to the USA-WA1/2020 strain.
Authors
Natalia A. Kuzmina, Sivakumar Periasamy, Kritika Kedarinath, Keziah Hernandez, Caroline Atyeo, S. Moses Dennison, Kan Li, Daniel Bedinger, Sharon L. Schendel, Georgia D. Tomaras, Hanif Ali, Galit Alter, Erica Ollmann Saphire, Alexander Bukreyev
Usage data is cumulative from February 2026 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,303 | 0 |
| 383 | 0 | |
| Figure | 979 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 242 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 280 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,187 | 0 |
| Total Views | 4,187 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
