Usage Information
Abstract
The increase in antimicrobial resistant infections has fueled a resurgent interest in bacteriophage (phage) therapy. We conducted a literature review of personalized phage therapy cases in the peer-reviewed, English-language literature reported between 1/1/2005, to 8/31/2025 for which individual patient data were available, identifying and synthesizing data from a total of 323 patients described in 83 studies. Most patients (68%, 221/323) were treated with ≥ 2 phages (a phage cocktail). The median concentration of phages was 108 PFU/mL (IQR 107–109). Most patients (76%, 246/323) received antibiotics concurrent with phage therapy. The median duration of therapy was 10 days (IQR 5–21). The most common indications for phage therapy were skin/soft tissue, pulmonary, orthopedic, osteoarticular, and genitourinary infections. 144 patients received fixed (off-the-shelf) phage preparations whereas 179 received bespoke phage preparations (i.e., personalized therapy). For cases where outcomes data were available, 78% (253/323), experienced clinical improvement while the targeted pathogen was eradicated in 61% (177/290) of cases. Nine patients had treatment withdrawn due to tolerability concerns. These data indicate that there is substantial heterogeneity in current personalized phage therapy clinical practices but that this approach can be successful.
Authors
Patrick M. Blankenberg, Robert Targ, Grace D. Cullen, Gina A. Suh, Krystyna Dąbrowska, Aarav Singh, Tiffany Luong, Daisuke Furukawa, Paul L. Bollyky
Usage data is cumulative from October 2026 through October 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 135 | 0 |
| 69 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 46 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 38 | 0 |
| Totals | 288 | 0 |
| Total Views | 288 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
