Submit a comment
Abstract
BACKGROUND Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) alters right ventricular size and function, curtailing life expectancy. Patients may experience angina and myocardial ischemia. However, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood.METHODS This study had a cross-sectional, case-control design. Patients with IPAH undergoing right heart catheterization were prospectively enrolled and underwent functional testing during coronary angiography using a dual pressure/temperature-sensitive guidewire. Cardiovascular MRI measured left and right ventricular mass and function. Right ventricular tissue from individuals with end-stage PAH and control individuals were analyzed for pathophysiology.RESULTS Eleven IPAH and 15 control participants completed the protocol: 73% of IPAH patients had an elevated index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR > 25) and 55% had reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR < 2.0). Mean IMR was significantly higher in IPAH participants (39.2 ± 27.0 vs. 15.3 ± 5.0, P = 0.002), whereas mean CFR was lower (2.8 ± 2.1 vs. 4.0 ± 1.4; P = 0.077). Paired right coronary artery/ventricular measurements (n = 6) revealed IMR positively correlated with right ventricular mass (r = 0.91, P = 0.12) and negatively with CFR (r = –0.82, P = 0.046). Compared with controls (n = 5), PAH participants (n = 4) had reduced right ventricular capillary density, increased cardiomyocyte area, and increased mural area in pre-capillary arterioles.CONCLUSION Invasive coronary function testing was feasible and safe in IPAH. Coronary microvascular dysfunction was prevalent in IPAH and correlated with increased right ventricular mass. Histopathology revealed vascular rarefaction and remodeling of pre-capillary arterioles.FUNDING The British Heart Foundation (BHF) (PG/18/6134217) and the Golden Jubilee Research Foundation.
Authors
Erin Boland, Michael G. Freeman, David S. Corcoran, Thomas J. Ford, Barry Hennigan, Damien Collison, Aida Llucià-Valldeperas, Frances S. de Man, Kanarath P. Balachandran, Martin Johnson, Colin Church, Colin Berry
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
