Submit a comment
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding age-associated differences in acute and memory adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and how they contribute to more favorable outcomes in children is critically important.METHODS We evaluated SARS-CoV-2–specific T cell, B cell, and antibody responses in 329 peripheral blood samples collected from nonhospitalized children, adolescents, and adults at 3 time points, including acute and memory time points.RESULTS Most children produced robust CD4+ T cell responses during infection and developed memory CD4+ T cells; however, young children less than 4 years old often had undetectable CD4+ T cell responses compared with older children and adults. Young children also generated reduced frequencies of memory B cells; despite this, they mounted substantial and durable neutralizing antibody responses. CD4+ T cell responses in children were biased toward non-spike epitopes, especially in asymptomatic cases. Memory B cells in children were preferentially classical memory or, paradoxically, CXCR3+.CONCLUSION These findings support the concept that the kinetics and composition of T and B cell responses shift across age groups and may be associated with milder COVID-19 outcomes in children.FUNDING NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) award AI142742, the Duke University School of Medicine, and grants from the Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals, the Translating Duke Health Children’s Health and Discovery Initiative, the NIH NIAID (R01-AI161008-02), and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency N66001-09-C-2082. NIH Career Development Awards (K23-AI135090 and K01-AI173398). NIH contract 75N93019C00065.
Authors
L. Benjamin Hills, Numana Bhat, Jillian H. Hurst, Amber Myers, Thomas W. Burke, Micah T. McClain, Elizabeth Petzold, Alexandre T. Rotta, Nicholas A. Turner, Alba Grifoni, Daniela Weiskopf, Yvonne Dogariu, Genevieve G. Fouda, Sallie R. Permar, Alessandro Sette, Christopher W. Woods, Matthew S. Kelly, Shane Crotty
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
