Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The EMT factor ZEB1 paradoxically inhibits EMT in BRAF-mutant carcinomas
Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo
Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Gastroenterology Oncology

The EMT factor ZEB1 paradoxically inhibits EMT in BRAF-mutant carcinomas

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Despite being in the same pathway, mutations of KRAS and BRAF in colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) determine distinct progression courses. ZEB1 induces an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and is associated with worse progression in most carcinomas. Using samples from patients with CRC, mouse models of KrasG12D and BrafV600E CRC, and a Zeb1-deficient mouse, we show that ZEB1 had opposite functions in KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRCs. In KrasG12D CRCs, ZEB1 was correlated with a worse prognosis and a higher number of larger and undifferentiated (mesenchymal or EMT-like) tumors. Surprisingly, in BrafV600E CRC, ZEB1 was associated with better prognosis; fewer, smaller, and more differentiated (reduced EMT) primary tumors; and fewer metastases. ZEB1 was positively correlated in KRAS-mutant CRC cells and negatively in BRAF-mutant CRC cells with gene signatures for EMT, cell proliferation and survival, and ERK signaling. On a mechanistic level, ZEB1 knockdown in KRAS-mutant CRC cells increased apoptosis and reduced clonogenicity and anchorage-independent growth; the reverse occurred in BRAFV600E CRC cells. ZEB1 is associated with better prognosis and reduced EMT signature in patients harboring BRAF CRCs. These data suggest that ZEB1 can function as a tumor suppressor in BRAF-mutant CRCs, highlighting the importance of considering the KRAS/BRAF mutational background of CRCs in therapeutic strategies targeting ZEB1/EMT.

Authors

Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo

×

Figure 1

Unlike in KrasG12D CRC, Zeb1 determines a longer survival, smaller and fewer lesions or tumors and metastasis in BrafV600E CRC.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Unlike in KrasG12D CRC, Zeb1 determines a longer survival, smaller and f...
(A) Left: Overall survival of KrasG12D mice with 2 (KVZ+/+; represented by black line in graph; 12 males, 14 females) or 1 (KVZ+/–; blue line in graph; 11 censored; 8 males, 12 females) WT Zeb1 alleles. Right: As in the left panel but for Braf mice: BVZ+/+; black line; 9 censored; 11 males, 10 females; and BVZ+/–; green line; 7 males, 4 females. Log-rank test statistics were applied. (B) Left: Respective numbers of colonic lesions or tumors of KVZ+/+ (represented by black line in graph; n = 8, 9, 7 mice), KVZ+/– (blue line; n = 5, 9, 7), and Z+/– (gray line; n = 6, 6, 11). Right: As for BVZ+/+ (black lines; n = 6, 10, 10), BVZ+/– (green line; n = 6, 12, 9). (C) Number of macroscopic colonic lesions in KVZ+/+ and KVZ+/– (left) and BVZ+/+ and BVZ+/– (right) mice (aged ≥ 8 months) according to tumor size. The pie charts at the bottom represent tumor size independent of the number of tumors. Two-tailed t test statistics were used in B and C. (D) No effect on total BW in CRC mouse models: in 4.5-month-old Z+/– (n = 5), KVZ+/+ (n = 8), and KVZ+/– (n = 7) mice (left) and in 8-month-old Z+/– (n = 8), BVZ+/+ (n = 10), and BVZ+/– (n = 7) mice (right). (E) KrasG12D mice did not develop metastasis. Images of liver (left) and lung (right) of KVZ+/+ and KVZ+/– mice at age >8 months. Respective sample numbers are ZEB1+/– (n = 10, 5), KVZ+/+ (n = 7, 7), and KVZ+/– (n = 7, 7) mice. Scale bar: 200 μm. (F) Left: Liver images of BVZ+/+ and BVZ+/– mice and CK20 staining. Scale bar: 50 μm. Right: Liver weight in ≥8-month-old Z+/– (n = 5), BVZ+/+ (n = 10), and BVZ+/– (n = 7) mice. Stratification of cohorts based on weight above or below the median. (G) As in F, but for lung in 8-month-old Z+/– (n = 5), BVZ+/+ (n = 10), and BVZ+/– (n = 9) mice. Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used in D–G. P values are reported in Supplemental Table 16. ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, or *P ≤ 0.05.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts