With the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections, there is interest in using bacteriophages (phages) to treat such infections. However, the factors that govern bacteriophage pharmacokinetics in vivo remain poorly understood. Here, we have examined the contribution of neutrophils, the most abundant phagocytes in the body, to the pharmacokinetics of i.v. administered bacteriophage in uninfected mice. A single dose of LPS-5, a bacteriophage recently used in human clinical trials to treat drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, was administered i.v. to both immunocompetent BALB/c and neutropenic CD1 mice. Phage concentrations were assessed in peripheral blood and spleen at 0.25, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after administration by plaque assay and qPCR. We observed that the phage clearance was only minimally affected by neutropenia. Indeed, the half-lives of phages in blood in BALB/c and CD1 mice were 3.45 and 3.66 hours, respectively. These data suggest that neutrophil-mediated phagocytosis is not a major determinant of phage clearance. Conversely, we observed a substantial discrepancy in circulating phage levels over time when measured by qPCR versus plaque assay, suggesting that significant inactivation of circulating phages occurs over time. These data indicate that alternative factors, but not neutrophils, inactivate i.v. administered phages.
Arne Echterhof, Tejas Dharmaraj, Arya Khosravi, Robert McBride, Lynn Miesel, Ju-Hsin Chia, Patrick M. Blankenberg, Kun-Yuan Lin, Chien-Chang Shen, Yu-Ling Lee, Yu-Chuan Yeh, Wei Ting Liao, Francis G. Blankenberg, Krystyna Dąbrowska, Derek F. Amanatullah, Adam R. Frymoyer, Paul L. Bollyky
Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,067 | 379 |
| 298 | 91 | |
| Figure | 513 | 2 |
| Table | 103 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 136 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 292 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,409 | 474 |
| Total Views | 3,883 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.