Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Imlunestrant a next-generation oral SERD overcomes ESR1 mutant resistance in estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer
Shira Sherman, Zachary M. Sandusky, Douglas Russo, David Zak, Agostina Nardone, Delia Friel, Francisco Hermida-Prado, Capucine Heraud, Genevra Kuziel, Ana Verma, Giorgio Gaglia, Sheheryar Kabraji, Quang-De Nguyen, Sandro Santagata, Sean W. Fanning, Rinath Jeselsohn
Shira Sherman, Zachary M. Sandusky, Douglas Russo, David Zak, Agostina Nardone, Delia Friel, Francisco Hermida-Prado, Capucine Heraud, Genevra Kuziel, Ana Verma, Giorgio Gaglia, Sheheryar Kabraji, Quang-De Nguyen, Sandro Santagata, Sean W. Fanning, Rinath Jeselsohn
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Oncology

Imlunestrant a next-generation oral SERD overcomes ESR1 mutant resistance in estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Estrogen receptor α (ER) is a critical driver of tumorigenesis and tumor progression in most breast cancers. Endocrine therapies (ET) targeting ER are central to treating hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, but resistance poses a clinical challenge. Some resistance mechanisms, particularly those involving estrogen-independent activity such as the ESR1 mutations, rely on ER signaling, supporting the need for next-generation ET. We investigated the preclinical efficacy of imlunestrant, an oral selective ER degrader, in ER-positive breast cancer preclinical models, including models harboring the Y537S ESR1 mutation, an activating mutation. Imlunestrant demonstrated antagonistic activity and effective degradation of both WT and mutant ER, resulting in cell growth suppression. In vivo, imlunestrant outperformed fulvestrant, leading to tumor regression in a patient-derived xenograft harboring the Y537S ESR1 mutation. Cyclic mutiplexed immunofluorescence and transcriptomic analysis revealed enhanced cell cycle arrest and downregulation of estrogen-responsive genes with imlunestrant treatment. Additionally, a genome-wide CRISPR knock–out screen identified several vulnerabilities that were either persistent or acquired after imlunestrant treatment, providing a rationale for future studies of combination treatments with imlunestrant. Collectively, these results highlight the on-target and selective activity of imlunestrant, which can circumvent resistance engendered by the Y537S ESR1 mutation.

Authors

Shira Sherman, Zachary M. Sandusky, Douglas Russo, David Zak, Agostina Nardone, Delia Friel, Francisco Hermida-Prado, Capucine Heraud, Genevra Kuziel, Ana Verma, Giorgio Gaglia, Sheheryar Kabraji, Quang-De Nguyen, Sandro Santagata, Sean W. Fanning, Rinath Jeselsohn

×

Figure 3

Imlunestrant treatment leads to decreased proliferation and tumor regression.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Imlunestrant treatment leads to decreased proliferation and tumor regres...
(A) Tumor volumes of ER-Y537S PDX treated with vehicle (VEH, black), 5 mg subcutaneous fulvestrant (FULV, purple) per week, or 15mg/kg oral daily imlunestrant (IML, orange). Error bars denote ± SD. Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. n = 3 mice/treatment on day 10 and n = 5 mice/treatment on day 28. (B) Body weight of the PDX-bearing mice treated with VEH, FULV, or IML. Error bars denote ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (C) Representative images of IHC staining on ER-Y537S PDX day 10 for ER or PR or Ki67; scale bar: 100 μm. (D) IHC staining index for ER or (E) PR or (F) % Ki67 positive on ER-Y537S PDX day 10 tissue. Box and whisker plot with maximum and minimum. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, n = 2 mice, 4–5 images from each mouse. (G) Representative images of IHC staining on ER-Y537S PDX tissue treatment day 28 stained for ER or PR or Ki67. 20× magnification, scale bar: 100 μm. (H) IHC staining index for ER or (I) PR or (J) % Ki67 positive on day 28 ER-Y537S PDX tissue. Box and whisker plot with maximum and minimum. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, n = 2 mice, 4–5 images from each mouse. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts