Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Protein-protein interaction–interfering peptide rescues dysregulated NMDA receptor signaling
Robert E. Featherstone, Hongbin Li, Ameet S. Sengar, Karin E. Borgmann-Winter, Olya Melnychenko, Lindsey M. Crown, Ray L. Gifford, Felix Amirfathi, Anamika Banerjee, AiVi Tran, Krishna Parekh, Margaret Heller, Wenyu Zhang, Robert J. Gallop, Adam D. Marc, Pragya Komal, Michael W. Salter, Steven J. Siegel, Chang-Gyu Hahn
Robert E. Featherstone, Hongbin Li, Ameet S. Sengar, Karin E. Borgmann-Winter, Olya Melnychenko, Lindsey M. Crown, Ray L. Gifford, Felix Amirfathi, Anamika Banerjee, AiVi Tran, Krishna Parekh, Margaret Heller, Wenyu Zhang, Robert J. Gallop, Adam D. Marc, Pragya Komal, Michael W. Salter, Steven J. Siegel, Chang-Gyu Hahn
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Neuroscience

Protein-protein interaction–interfering peptide rescues dysregulated NMDA receptor signaling

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The complex and heterogeneous genetic architecture of neuropsychiatric illnesses compels us to look beyond individual risk genes for therapeutic strategies and target the interactive dynamics and convergence of their protein products. A mechanistic substrate for convergence of synaptic neuropsychiatric risk genes are protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) complex. NMDAR hypofunction in schizophrenia is associated with hypoactivity of Src kinase, resulting from convergent alterations in PPIs of Src with its partners. Of these, the association of Src with PSD-95, which inhibits the activity of this kinase in the NMDAR complex, is known to be increased in schizophrenia. Here, we devised a strategy to suppress the inhibition of Src by PSD-95 by employing a cell-penetrating and Src-activating PSD-95 inhibitory peptide (TAT-SAPIP). TAT-SAPIP enhanced synaptic NMDAR currents in Src+/– and Sdy–/– mice manifesting NMDAR hypofunction phenotypes. Chronic intracerebroventricularly (ICV) injection of TAT-SAPIP rescued cognitive deficits in trace fear conditioning in Src +/– mice. Moreover, TAT-SAPIP enhanced Src activity in synaptoneurosomes derived from dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of 14 patients. We propose blockade of the Src–PSD-95 interaction as a proof of concept for the use of interfering peptides as a therapeutic strategy to reverse NMDAR hypofunction in schizophrenia and other illnesses.

Authors

Robert E. Featherstone, Hongbin Li, Ameet S. Sengar, Karin E. Borgmann-Winter, Olya Melnychenko, Lindsey M. Crown, Ray L. Gifford, Felix Amirfathi, Anamika Banerjee, AiVi Tran, Krishna Parekh, Margaret Heller, Wenyu Zhang, Robert J. Gallop, Adam D. Marc, Pragya Komal, Michael W. Salter, Steven J. Siegel, Chang-Gyu Hahn

×

Figure 3

TAT-SAPIP rescues deficits in auditory event–related potentials and TFC in Src+/– mice and enhances Src activity in the DLPFC of patients.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
TAT-SAPIP rescues deficits in auditory event–related potentials and TFC ...
(A) Event-related potential response to a novel versus a repeated (standard) stimulus. Response to the novel stimulus was increased in Src+/– mice following TAT-SAPIP. *P < 0.05. Group sizes were 22 WT vehicle (11 male, 11 female), 26 Src+/– vehicle (14 male, 12 female), 23 WT SAPIP (12 male, 11 female), and 22 Src+/– SAPIP (12 male,10 female). No effect was observed for sex. Data were analyzed using a 3-way ANOVA with genotype, sex, and treatment as variables. (B) TFC in WT and Src+/– mice following vehicle or TAT-SAPIP. WT mice treated with vehicle showed significantly more freezing during the cue relative to precue period (**P < 0.01), which was not seen in Src +/- mice. TAT-SAPIP restored TFC in Src+/– mice (**P < 0.01). Group sizes were 24 WT vehicle( 11 male, 13 female), 27 Src+/– vehicle (12 male, 15 female), 25 WT SAPIP (14 male, 11 female), and 21 Src+/– SAPIP (10 male, 11 female). No effect was observed for sex. Data were analyzed 3-way repeated measures ANOVA. (C and D) The effects of TAT-SAPIP on Src activity. Synapto-neurosomes or cytosol from the PFC of mice (C) or from the DLPFC of 14 humans (D) were incubated with 200 ng of TAT-SAPIP and Src activity was measured as previously described (12). SAPIP significantly increased Src activity in synaptoneurosomes derived from mouse (266.6% ± 32.2% of base line, n = 10, P = 0.0009) or human PFC (170.0% ± 29.4%, n = 30, P = 0.024). Bar graphs in C and D show mean and standard error of the mean. For A–D, dots represent individual data points and data represent mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts