Usage Information
Abstract
The immune mechanisms induced by the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, and the subset of which that mediate protection against tuberculosis (TB), remain poorly understood. This is further complicated by difficulties in verifying vaccine-induced protection in humans. Although research in animal models, namely mice and nonhuman primates (NHPs), has begun to close this knowledge gap, discrepancies in the relative importance of biological pathways across species limit the utility of animal model–derived biological insights in humans. To address these challenges, we applied a systems modeling framework, Translatable Components Regression (TransCompR), to identify human blood transcriptional variability that could predict Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge outcomes in BCG-vaccinated NHPs. These protection-associated pathways included both innate and adaptive immune activation mechanisms, along with signaling via type I IFNs and antimycobacterial Th cytokines. We further partially validated the associations between these mechanisms and protection in humans using publicly available microarray data collected from BCG-vaccinated infants who either developed TB or remained healthy during 2 years of follow-up. Overall, our work demonstrates how species translation modeling can leverage animal studies to generate hypotheses about the mechanisms that underlie human infectious disease and vaccination outcomes, which may be difficult or impossible to ascertain using human data alone.
Authors
Kate Bridges, Denis Awany, Anele Gela, Temwa-Dango Mwambene, Sherry L. Kurtz, Richard E. Baker, Karen L. Elkins, Christopher M. Sassetti, Thomas J. Scriba, Douglas A. Lauffenburger
Usage data is cumulative from November 2025 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,839 | 99 |
| 654 | 17 | |
| Figure | 882 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 749 | 5 |
| Citation downloads | 549 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,673 | 121 |
| Total Views | 5,794 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
