Usage Information
Abstract
About one-third of neonatal seizures do not respond to the first-line anticonvulsant phenobarbital, which activates phasic inhibition and whose effectiveness decreases over time. Whether enhancing tonic inhibition can treat refractory seizures or status epilepticus in neonates remains uncertain. We evaluated the effect of recurrent seizure-like events (SLE) on α5– and δ–GABAA receptor (α5- and δ-GABAAR) subunit expression and tonic inhibition in neonatal C57BL/6J mice (P6–9, both sexes) using acute brain slices. We investigated the impact of THIP (gaboxadol) on neonatal behavioral seizures, neuronal apoptosis, and neurodegeneration in vivo. We found neonatal neocortical expression of α5- and δ-GABAAR subunits. Blocking α5-GABAARs with L-655,708 did not affect acute neonatal SLE, whereas enhancing δ-GABAARs with THDOC, a neurosteroid, reduced them. The α5- and δ-GABAAR membrane expression increased after 8 hours of neonatal SLE and correlated with increased δ-mediated conductance but not α5-mediated conductance. Enhancing tonic inhibition was more effective in reducing recurrent neonatal SLE (8 hours) compared with early treatment. Increasing tonic inhibition reduced the duration, severity, and number of kainic acid–induced in vivo neonatal behavioral seizures without increasing neurodegeneration or apoptosis. We conclude that recurrent neonatal seizures increase tonic inhibition. Therefore, enhancing tonic inhibition may be a treatment strategy for prolonged neonatal status epilepticus.
Authors
Gage T. Liddiard, Gordon F. Buchanan, Mark L. Schultz, Joseph Glykys
Usage data is cumulative from September 2025 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,046 | 67 |
| 451 | 15 | |
| Figure | 836 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 186 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 222 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,741 | 82 |
| Total Views | 3,823 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
