Usage Information
Abstract
Stem cell–derived β cells offer a promising approach for type 1 diabetes (T1D) treatment. However, the processes of graft infiltration and rejection by immune cells remain poorly understood in humans. In this study, autologous or allogeneic stem cell–derived islets (SC-islets) were transplanted in human immune system mice and analyzed 14 to 18 weeks later. Imaging mass cytometry revealed unique characteristics of SC-islet grafts, including a high percentage of glucagon+ cells and the presence of cysts and CD57+ enterochromaffin cells, features not typically observed in endogenous or transplanted allogeneic primary pancreatic islets. Allogeneic SC-islet grafts exhibited heavy immune infiltration, cell proliferation, and pro-fibrotic processes, whereas autologous grafts showed minimal infiltration and little fibrosis. In some mice, autologous T cells expressing islet antigen-reactive (IAR) T cell receptors (TCRs) were adoptively transferred. Three weeks after transfer, autologous grafts injected with IAR-TCR+ T cells showed negligible immune infiltration, even though IAR-TCR+ T cells were detected in the spleen. Under the conditions tested, human SC-islet grafts were not rejected by an autologous immune system, even in the presence of autoreactive T cells, pointing to several limitations that remain to be addressed for a model of spontaneous autologous SC-islet infiltration and destruction.
Authors
Camillo Bechi Genzano, Giorgia Zanetti, Qian Du, Daniel Traum, Deeksha Lahori, Grant M. Downes, Sakshi A. Bhatele, Xiaolan Ding, Kyle D. Apley, Rebuma Firdessa Fite, Matthew Ishahak, Enrique Eduardo Sanchez-Castro, Jeffrey R. Millman, Yiming Luo, Klaus H. Kaestner, Cory Berkland, Dieter Egli, Megan Sykes, Remi J. Creusot
Usage data is cumulative from June 2026 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,045 | 0 |
| 264 | 0 | |
| Figure | 461 | 0 |
| Table | 37 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 91 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 98 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,996 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,996 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
