Usage Information
Abstract
Lineage plasticity, or transdifferentiation, is increasingly recognized as a resistance mechanism to androgen receptor (AR) inhibition in prostate cancer. Lineage plasticity is characterized by loss of AR signaling and epithelial differentiation, along with activation of stemness-associated pathways, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), or alternative differentiation programs such as neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). Loss of the tumor suppressors TP53 and RB1 is common in tumors exhibiting lineage plasticity; however, mechanisms by which TP53/RB1 loss promotes this phenotype remain poorly understood, and effective treatments are limited. Using multi-omic profiling of TP53/RB1 loss prostate cancer models, we identified alterations in chromatin accessibility, DNA methylation, and gene expression associated with lineage plasticity. Importantly, many pathways activated upon TP53/RB1 loss could be blocked through BET bromodomain inhibition. TP53/RB1-deficient cells also harbored widespread DNA methylation changes that silenced pathways linked with restraining lineage plasticity. Combined BET bromodomain and DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibition was more effective than single agent treatment in suppressing growth of TP53/RB1 loss models exhibiting a stem-like or NEPC program. This was partly explained by abrogation of discrete lineage plasticity pathways modulated by each agent. Altogether, our work suggests combined BET bromodomain and DNMT inhibition is a promising therapeutic approach for prostate tumors exhibiting lineage plasticity.
Authors
William K. Storck, Diana Flores, Anbarasu Kumaraswamy, Zhi Duan, Shrabastee Chakraborty, Chao Zhang, Eva Rodansky, Dhruv Khokhani, Olivia A. Swaim, Karan Bedi, Raymond G. Cavalcante, Canping Chen, Faming Zhao, Ya-Mei Hu, Zheng Xia, Ryan J. Rebernick, Marcin Cieslik, Rahul Mannan, Somnath Mahapatra, Arul M. Chinnaiyan, Aaron M. Udager, Joshua A. Kuleape, Catherine R. Alumkal, Hannah N. Beck, Peter S. Nelson, Colm Morrissey, Michael C. Haffner, Leigh Ellis, Yuzhuo Wang, Joel A. Yates, Joshi J. Alumkal
Usage data is cumulative from August 2026 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 323 | 0 |
| 107 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 623 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,114 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,114 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
