Usage Information
Abstract
BACKGROUND. This prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase 1/2 trial evaluated vorinostat added to standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (AYA) patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from HLA-matched related, HLA-matched unrelated, and haploidentical donors. METHODS. Patients aged 3–39 years received twice-daily vorinostat with tacrolimus/methotrexate after HLA-matched HCT from day −10 to +30, or with post-transplant cyclophosphamide/tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil after haploidentical HCT from day +5 to +30. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of grade II–IV acute GVHD by day +100. All outcomes were based on intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS. Forty-three patients were enrolled; median age was 19 years, with 74% receiving HLA-matched and 26% haploidentical HCT. The recommended phase 2 dose was 60 mg/m² twice daily. No dose-limiting toxicities, unexpected vorinostat-related serious adverse events, or primary graft failures occurred. Median neutrophil and platelet recovery occurred at 14 and 18 days, respectively. Day +100 grade II–IV and III–IV acute GVHD were 14% (95% CI, 5.6, 26) and 4.7% (95% CI, 0.83, 14), respectively. One-year overall survival was 88.4% (95% CI, 79.3, 98.5), relapse 14% (95% CI: 5.6, 26), nonrelapse mortality 4.7% (95% CI: 0.8, 14), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival 55.8% (95% CI: 42.8, 72.8). Correlative studies demonstrated on-target HDAC activity, with increased histone acetylation and lower proinflammatory cytokines. CONCLUSION. These findings support randomized evaluation of vorinostat-based GVHD prophylaxis in pediatric and AYA HCT. TRIAL REGISTRY. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03842696.
Authors
Nicolas Parnell, Xiao Cao, Jan H. Beumer, Thomas M. Braun, Yilei Cui, Gary J. Fisher, Guoqing Hou, Julianne Holleran, Tracey Churay, Michelle Rozwadowski, Luna Heider, Mark T. Vander Lugt, Carrie L. Kitko, April L. Rahrig, Ed Peres, Kirsten M. Williams, Julie-An Talano, Vanessa A. Fabrizio, Ghada Abusin, Gregory A. Yanik, John Magenau, Mary Riwes, Marcus J. Geer, Sarah Anand, Monalisa Ghosh, Attaphol Pawarode, Kristen Votruba, Pavan Reddy, Sung Won Choi
Usage data is cumulative from September 2026 through September 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 89 | 0 |
| 48 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 12 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 26 | 0 |
| Totals | 175 | 0 |
| Total Views | 175 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
