Submit a comment
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a global health concern with limited interventions. While the role of gut bacteria in MASLD has been extensively studied, the contribution of gut fungi remains largely unexplored. This study investigates the impact of fungal dysbiosis and the role of CARD9, a key adaptor protein in fungal sensing on gut-liver axis dysfunction in MASLD. Patients with advanced liver fibrosis exhibited distinct mycobiota profiles. Using a Card9-deficient mouse model subjected to high-fat, high-glucose/-fructose feeding, we observed exacerbated liver injury and fibrosis accompanied by fungal dysbiosis, paralleling our findings in human patients. Beyond its established expression in myeloid cells, CARD9 was also detected in intestinal enterocytes where its expression was diminished under metabolic stress. Intestinal organoids with CARD9 inhibition had reduced expression of antimicrobial Reg3g, the tight junction protein ZO-1, and the antifungal enteroendocrine hormone PYY. These findings suggest that CARD9 maintains gut barrier integrity, preventing microbial translocation and subsequent liver injury and fibrosis. Our results provide insights into the interplay between fungal dysbiosis, gut barrier dysfunction, and MASLD, and identify CARD9 as a key protein within this axis.
Authors
Vijay Pandyarajan, So Yeon Kim, Takashi Tsuchiya, Selena Liu, Sadam H. Bhat, Jieun Kim, David M. Underhill, Mazen Noureddin, Shelly C. Lu, Ekihiro Seki
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
