Submit a comment
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Disseminated coccidioidomycosis (DCM) is an often fatal and otherwise intractable condition requiring lifelong antifungal treatment. We have previously shown that a deranged polarization of CD4+ T cells toward a Th2 phenotype can exist in the context of DCM. Here we studied a large population of subjects to determine the frequency of abnormal Th2 skewing of CD4+ T cells in patients with coccidioidomycosis and to identify underlying genetic mechanisms supporting this phenotype. METHODS. We collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 204 patients with coccidioidomycosis, including 96 patients with disseminated disease. We measured immune phenotypes and cytokine production by CD4+ T cells from patients and healthy controls, and comparisons between groups were made based on disease severity and demographics. Whole genome sequencing was conducted on 180 individuals who also had cytokine profiling. RESULTS. We found that ~25% of DCM patients had a CD4+ T-cell compartment that was abnormally skewed toward a Th2 phenotype, and Th2 skewing was highly correlated with male sex. Co-culture of T cells with the IL4R/IL13R-blocking antibody dupilumab reduced Th2 skewing. Sequencing revealed rare variants in genes involved in the IL-12-IFN-γ axis in several Th2-skewed patients, and we validated one such variant in IFNGR1 as hypomorphic. CONCLUSION. Patients with DCM, especially males, should be screened for Th2 skewing of CD4+ T cells. Patients with Th2 skewing should be additionally screened for genetic defects in the IL-12-IFN-γ axis. Our findings give a mechanistic rationale for blockade of IL4R in Th2-skewed patients with refractory coccidioidomycosis.
Authors
Timothy J. Thauland, Smriti S. Nagarajan, Alexis V. Stephens, Samantha L. Jensen, Anviksha Srivastava, Miguel A. Moreno Lastre, Terrie S. Ahn, Chantana Bun, Michael T. Trump, Royce H. Johnson, George R. Thompson III, Maria I. Garcia-Lloret, Valerie A. Arboleda, Manish J. Butte
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
