Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
Advertisement

Research ArticleBone biologyCell biologyNeuroscience Open Access | 10.1172/jci.insight.197475

Reduced osteogenic factors and early osteoblast senescence in SOD1(G93A) ALS mouse model

Burak Özkan,1 Jan-Moritz Ramge,2 Diana Wiesner,3 Jelena Scekic-Zahirovic,3 Stefano Antonucci,1 Sandra Nungeß,2 Dorothea Gebauer,2 Anita Ignatius,2 Jochen H. Weishaupt,1,3 Melanie Haffner-Luntzer,2 and Francesco Roselli1,3

1Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

2Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)–Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Find articles by Özkan, B. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

2Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)–Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Find articles by Ramge, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

2Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)–Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Find articles by Wiesner, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

2Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)–Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Find articles by Scekic-Zahirovic, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

2Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)–Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Find articles by Antonucci, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

2Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)–Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Find articles by Nungeß, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

2Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)–Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Find articles by Gebauer, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

2Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)–Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Find articles by Ignatius, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

2Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)–Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Find articles by Weishaupt, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

2Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)–Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Find articles by Haffner-Luntzer, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

2Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)–Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Find articles by Roselli, F. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Authorship note: MHL and FR have been designated as co–senior authors.

Published January 22, 2026 - More info

Published in Volume 11, Issue 5 on March 9, 2026
JCI Insight. 2026;11(5):e197475. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.197475.
© 2026 Özkan et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published January 22, 2026 - Version history
Received: July 2, 2025; Accepted: January 14, 2026
View PDF
Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive motor neuron disease. Emerging evidence suggests manifestations beyond the neuromuscular system. Bone alterations are part of the ALS clinical picture; it remains unclear whether they are secondary to muscle denervation or due to an autonomous process. We investigated skeletal involvement in the SOD1(G93A) mouse model at presymptomatic (P45) and symptomatic (P110) stages through biomechanical and transcriptomic approaches. Three-point bending revealed significant reductions in femoral rigidity and maximum bending force in SOD1 mutants at P45, indicating early structural deficits. Micro-CT analysis demonstrated reduced trabecular bone mineral density and thickness at P45, with progressive trabecular loss and cortical thinning by P110. Histological examination revealed marked osteoblast loss at P45, suggesting impaired bone formation as the primary early mechanism. Transcriptomics of bulk bone and cultured osteoblasts from P45 mice identified dysregulation of bone differentiation, including downregulation of osteoblast differentiation genes and upregulation of negative regulators of ossification and increased cell senescence signatures. Unfolded protein response was upregulated in SOD1 osteoblasts. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the senescence phenotype with increased p16Ink4a level in SOD1 osteoblasts. These findings suggest that bone deterioration precedes overt motor symptoms and is linked to osteoblast premature senescence.

Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord, leading to progressive muscle weakness, paralysis, and ultimately respiratory failure (1). Traditionally, ALS has been studied for its devastating effects on the neuromuscular system, where motor neuron degeneration results in muscle atrophy and loss of voluntary movement control (2). However, emerging evidence suggests that both the pathogenic process and its consequences are not confined to the motor system but involve other areas of the nervous system as well as systemic manifestations at the level of sleep, metabolism, and connective tissue involvement (3–6). In particular, the impact of ALS on bone structure and turnover remains highly relevant since patients with ALS exhibit an increased risk of fractures, osteoporosis, and decreased bone mineral density (BMD), even before significant neuromuscular deterioration occurs (7). Thus, bone alterations may contribute to the decline in quality of life of ALS patients and interfere with physical treatment (8) and yet remain not mechanistically addressed. One major question is whether ALS-related skeletal fragility is solely a consequence of motor dysfunction or whether intrinsic defects in bone metabolism contribute early to this process.

Bone homeostasis is maintained through a dynamic equilibrium between bone deposition by osteoblasts and bone resorption by osteoclasts. Disruptions in this balance lead to reduced bone mass and increased fragility, predisposing individuals to fractures and osteoporosis (9). Multiple molecular mediators are involved in bone homeostasis: WNT, NOTCH, and BMP families control the differentiation of osteoblasts and bone deposition (10, 11), IGF-1 and IGF-2 promote the accumulation of bone mass (12), and several cytokines, including IL-6, enhance BMD (13). On the other hand, proinflammatory cytokines including IL-6 are also known to enhance bone resorption by osteoclasts, whereas osteoprotegerin, an antagonist to the osteoclastogenic molecule RANKL, negatively regulates them (14). More recently, senescence of bone cells has also been described as a mediator of loss of BMD (15), implying that cell-autonomous mechanisms may also contribute to disrupted bone architecture in aging and disease.

Seminal experimental work on the SOD1(G93A) ALS model identified late-onset bone alterations possibly related to reduced bone loading and oxidative damage (16, 17). Here, we combined biomechanical analysis, microradiography, and in vivo and in vitro transcriptomics to investigate the eventual occurrence of early events in ALS-related bone alterations and their molecular mechanism. We identify a set of structural, transcriptomic, and cell-biological abnormalities already at presymptomatic (pre-denervation) stages involving reduced sensitivity to pro-osteogenic factors, unfolded protein response, and enhanced bone cell senescence.

Results

Reduced bone mechanical resilience at presymptomatic and symptomatic stages in the SOD1 ALS mouse. We set out to investigate the overall structural properties of long bones in the SOD1(G93A) ALS mouse model using their biomechanical features as entry points. We considered two time points along the progression of SOD1 ALS mice: presymptomatic (before diffuse denervation occurs, P45) and symptomatic (evidence of overt symptoms, P110) (18). We took the femora into consideration and performed 3-point bending tests. Representative load-displacement curves from the 3-point bending tests at P45 and P110 are shown in Figure 1, A and B, and illustrate the lower slope and peak force in SOD1 femora compared with wild type (WT), consistent with the reduced bending stiffness and maximum bending force quantified in Figure 1, C and D. At P45, SOD1 bones already exhibited a significant reduction in flexural rigidity (E*I) compared with those of same-aged WT littermates (P < 0.01; Figure 1C), indicating a compromised resistance to mechanical stress. Compared with P45, WT P110 displayed a significant increase in the flexural rigidity, in agreement with the accumulation of bone mass into early adulthood. However, femora of SOD1 animals at P110 displayed only a trend toward lower E*I than WT (Figure 1C), indicating that over time SOD1 animals display accrual of bone resiliency, although not in all cases comparable to WT.

Altered bone biomechanical properties in SOD1(G93A) mice at presymptomaticFigure 1

Altered bone biomechanical properties in SOD1(G93A) mice at presymptomatic and symptomatic stages. (A and B) Representative 3-point bending force–deformation curves at P45 (A) and P110 (B). (C and D) Bending stiffness (flexural rigidity, E*I) (C) and maximum bending force (D) of femora from wild-type (WT) and SOD1(G93A) mice at presymptomatic (P45) and symptomatic (P110) stages. SOD1 mice show significantly reduced bending stiffness and maximum bending force at both time points. (E and F) Correlation analysis between bending stiffness and maximum bending force at P45 (E) and P110 (F). At P110, SOD1 mice display an inverse correlation (r = –0.81, P = 0.05), indicating pathological decoupling of normally related parameters. n = 5–7 per group. Statistical significance was determined using 1-way ANOVA followed by Šidák’s multiple-comparison test.

In agreement with flexural rigidity, the maximal bending force was significantly decreased in the bones of SOD1 mice at P45 (Figure 1D); again, while both WT and SOD1 displayed higher values at P110 compared with P45, SOD1 bones showed a significantly lower bending force (P < 0.05; Figure 1D), implying a reduced load-bearing capacity at both disease stages.

It is normally expected that bending stiffness and maximum bending force display a linear correlation, with increased stiffness leading to higher maximum bending force (19). When we tested this relationship in WT and SOD1 mice (Figure 1, E and F), we found a significant direct linear correlation between the two measures at the age of P45, although the range of stiffness was substantially left-shifted for SOD1 mice and the slope was steeper in SOD1 mice (Figure 1E). On the other hand, at P110 SOD1 animals displayed a strong trend (P = 0.05) toward an inverse correlation between bending stiffness and maximum bending force (Figure 1F), indicating a decoupling between these two measures.

Taken together, these data show an early alteration of bone biomechanics in SOD1 animals, and a substantial decoupling of biomechanical parameters at symptomatic stages. Interestingly, the mismatch between biomechanics (bending stiffness and maximum force) and micro-CT results indicates a simultaneous involvement of bone architecture and of bone matrix composition.

Presymptomatic trabecular thinning and reduced mineralization precede cortical thinning at symptomatic stage. To determine the architectural basis of the mechanical impairment in SOD1 bones, we performed high-resolution micro-CT imaging of trabecular and compact cortical compartments at P45 and P110 (Figure 2A). Trabecular tissue mineral density (Figure 2B) and trabecular bone volume ratio (Figure 2C) were significantly lower in SOD1 mice than in WT at both P45 and P110 (and with a significant decrease in trabecular number at P110 [Figure 2D]), indicating an early-onset and persistent deficit in mineralization (Figure 2, B and C).

Early trabecular thinning and reduced mineralization precede cortical boneFigure 2

Early trabecular thinning and reduced mineralization precede cortical bone loss in SOD1(G93A) mice. (A) Representative 3D micro-CT reconstructions of distal femora from WT and SOD1(G93A) mice at presymptomatic (P45) and symptomatic (P110) stages. In the representative 3D renderings, weakly mineralized bone is displayed in red, whereas moderately mineralized bone is displayed in yellow and highly mineralized bone in blue. Scale bars: 500 μm. (B–G) Quantitative micro-CT analysis showing trabecular tissue mineral density (Tb.TMD) (B), bone volume fraction (bone volume/tissue volume [BV/TV, percent]) (C), trabecular number (Tb.N) (D), cortical tissue mineral density (Ct.TMD) (E), cortical thickness (Ct.Th) (F), and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) (G). SOD1 mice display reduced trabecular parameters at both time points, while cortical changes appear later at P110. n = 7–9 per group. Statistical significance was determined using 1-way ANOVA followed by Šidák’s multiple-comparison test.

On the other hand, cortical tissue mineral density was unchanged at both time points (Figure 2E). Cortical thickness was not reduced at P45, but displayed a significant decline observable at P110 (Figure 2F). On the other hand, trabecular thickness (but not trabecular number; Figure 2D) was reduced at both P45 and P110 (Figure 2G). Trabecular number was comparable between WT and SOD1 mice at P45 but was significantly lower at P110, suggesting that the complete loss of individual trabeculae occurs later in disease progression (Figure 2D).

Taken together, these findings highlight the early reductions in trabecular mineralization and thickness at P45 followed by a more pervasive bone involvement at P110, including trabecular loss and cortical thinning. These structural deficiencies provide an architectural basis for the impaired flexural rigidity and reduced maximum force observed in SOD1(G93A) and confirm the occurrence of early bone structural involvement in ALS, before the appearance of substantial neuromuscular junction denervation.

Loss of osteoblasts at presymptomatic stage in the SOD1 bones. We set out to complement the microstructural analysis of the mineralized compartment of the bone (Figures 1 and 2) with the histological analysis of the bone cellular component. Immunohistochemistry against RUNX2 was exploited to highlight the osteoblast population, and on transmitted-light micrographs the number of RUNX2-positive osteoblasts and their surface contacting the bone matrix were quantified. DAB-positive osteoblasts were specifically quantified on the bone surface, and, as anticipated, RUNX2-positive osteoblasts formed a single-cell layer lining the bone trabeculae (Figure 3A). Interestingly, at presymptomatic stage the SOD1 bones already displayed a significant loss of osteoblasts, and a similarly large loss was observed at P110 (a decrease in osteoblasts was also observed in WT between P45 and P110, in agreement with bone maturation during early adulthood; Figure 3, A, C, and D).

Imbalance of osteoblast and osteoclast cells in SOD1(G93A) mice at presymptFigure 3

Imbalance of osteoblast and osteoclast cells in SOD1(G93A) mice at presymptomatic and symptomatic stages. (A and B) Representative immunohistochemical images of RUNX2-positive osteoblasts (A, brown staining) and TRAP-positive osteoclasts (B, red staining) in trabecular bone from WT and SOD1 mice at P45 and P110. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Upper panels show an overview at ×20 original magnification; lower panels show higher magnification. Scale bars: 50 μm (A), 100 μm (B). (C–F) Quantification of osteoblast number (N.Ob) (C) and surface (Ob.S) (D) and osteoclast number (N.Oc) (E) and surface (Oc.S) (F) per bone perimeter (B.Pm). BS, bone surface. SOD1 mice show reduced osteoblast parameters and increased osteoclast activity. Box plots show median, quartiles, and range. n = 7–9 per group. Statistical significance was determined using 1-way ANOVA followed by Šidák’s multiple-comparison test.

Reciprocally, the number of osteoclasts (revealed by staining for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase [TRAP]) displayed a minor increase at P45 (strong trend, P = 0.06) and a more substantial elevation at P110 (Figure 3, B and E); likewise, the extent of bone-facing surface of osteoclasts was increased both at P45 and at P110 (Figure 3, B and F). In line with these findings, serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I)) showed a trend toward higher values and N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) levels were significantly increased in SOD1 mice at P110, consistent with a high-turnover state at the symptomatic stage (Supplemental Figure 1, A and B; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.197475DS1).

Taken together, the histological data indicate a substantial deficit in bone deposition at P45 in conditions of small increase in bone resorption, followed by an intense bone degradation and dramatic loss of bone mass at P110. Thus, the early bone phenotype appears to be related to reduced bone deposition rather than active bone remodeling.

Bone bulk transcriptome reveals disruption of bone remodeling regulators, IL-6 signaling, and cellular senescence in SOD1 animals. In order to gain mechanistic and molecular insights into the processes shaping the alterations in bone architecture and cellular components already in presymptomatic SOD1 animals, we performed a bulk RNA-seq of RNA originating from the femur compact and trabecular bone, after extensive washing of bone marrow (Figure 4A). We considered 6 WT and 6 SOD1 samples, but 3 SOD1 samples did not pass quality control for overall low RNA quality/yield. Principal component analysis (PCA) (Figure 4B) revealed a clear segregation between genotypes, with PC1, distinguishing the genotypes, representing 80% of the variability. Differential gene expression analysis identified 489 upregulated and 248 downregulated genes (Figure 4C), pointing to widespread transcriptional dysregulation in SOD1 bones. The top 10 upregulated genes included ferritin light chain (Ftl2; involved in the suppression of osteoblast function) (20) and Eno1b (promoting glycolytic metabolism, also associated with increased bone resorption) (21), with other top genes related to cell adhesion, signaling, and transcriptional regulation (such as Hmgba1, Ceacam2, and Ppp1r3c). Conversely, among the top 10 downregulated genes, there were several major histocompatibility complex genes, two genes involved in interferon signaling (Oasl2 and Ifi204), and a metabolic regulator of phagocytes (Tbc1d1). Interestingly, aside from protein-coding genes, a number of pseudogenes were also upregulated in SOD1 samples, most notably two — Atp6rs2 and Atpv0c-ps2 — related to ATPases necessary for vacuole acidification.

Transcriptomic profiling of femoral bone reveals impaired osteogenesis, enhFigure 4

Transcriptomic profiling of femoral bone reveals impaired osteogenesis, enhanced resorption, and cellular senescence signatures in presymptomatic SOD1(G93A) mice. (A) Experimental pipeline showing femoral bone processing and RNA-seq workflow. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) of WT (n = 6) and SOD1 (n = 3) bone samples showing clear segregation with PC1 accounting for 80.61% of variance. (C) Volcano plot displaying differentially expressed genes with 489 upregulated and 248 downregulated genes in SOD1 bones (adjusted P < 0.05, |log2FC| > 1). (D) Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis showing upregulation of bone resorption pathways and downregulation of osteogenic processes. (E) Heatmaps of selected genes from enriched GO categories. (F) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealing significant downregulation of proliferation, immune response, and bone repair pathways in SOD1 bones. Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 with adjusted P < 0.05 and |log2FC| > 1. GO and GSEA analyses were performed with q value less than 0.05. Heatmap values represent z scores.

The comprehensive survey of Gene Ontology (GO) categories revealed the significant upregulation of multiple GO terms related to bone loss (such as negative regulation of bone mineralization, bone resorption, and osteoclast differentiation; Figure 4D) as well as the downregulation of multiple GO groups related to bone buildup (such as ossification, bone development and mineralization, positive regulation of osteoblast differentiation, and derepression of osteoclasts; Figure 4D). Intriguingly, some opposite GO categories also appeared: among the upregulated modules we identified the negative regulation of bone resorption (including the strong osteoprotective gene osteoprotegerin/Tnfrsf11b and the osteoclast differentiation suppressor genes Gpr137 and Gpr137b); the same category also appeared in the downregulated set, but with a different subset of corresponding genes (including P2rx7, an inducer of the multinucleated phenotype of osteoclasts, ref. 22; and Ship1/Inpp5d, a suppressor of bone mineralization, ref. 23).

Among the transcriptional modules detected by the GO analysis, 5 groups displayed a strong differential induction between SOD1 and WT bones; two of these groups, namely bone development genes (38 genes) and osteoblast differentiation genes (30 genes downregulated in SOD1 bones) (Figure 4E), supported the model of reduced bone deposition in the early stages of disease progression. Among the SOD1-downregulated genes we identified several soluble paracrine/endocrine mediators of bone deposition, including the pro-anabolic Igf1 and its binding protein Igfbp5, the pro-osteogenic Tgfb1 (24), and the pro-osteogenic Il18 (25), as well as the promoters of osteoblast proliferation Notch1 and Notch2 (26). Conversely, the remaining 3 categories were upregulated in SOD1 and included osteoclast differentiation genes (19 genes), bone resorption inducers (4 genes), and negative regulators of ossification (22 genes). Among the latter, SOD1 bones expressed higher levels of the suppressor of osteoblast differentiation and BMP signaling Gdf10/Bmp3b (27, 28) and Bmp3 (28) as well as the osteoclast differentiation inducers Bmp2 (29, 30).

Finally, we calculated the enrichment score for multiple functional pathways by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), which considers not only the list of altered genes, like in the GO analysis, but also the extent of their fold change (FC). Among the most significantly downregulated ones in SOD1 mice, we identified the E2F transcriptional network (Figure 4F), involved in cell senescence (31), and the G2M checkpoint, pointing to decreased proliferation of bone cells; furthermore, we identified the downregulation of mTOR and PI3K signaling (FDR 0.001 and 0.005, respectively), coherent with the catabolic state of the bone, and, interestingly, the downregulation of IL-6 signaling (which is normally required for appropriate bone repair) (13) and of complement (also involved in bone repair) (32).

Conversely, only a small number of pathways appeared upregulated in the SOD1 animals — including oxidative phosphorylation, pointing toward the involvement of mitochondrial biogenesis (FDR = 0.036; Figure 4F).

Taken together, the results of the bone bulk transcriptome confirm the reduced bone deposition and increased bone resorption but also the upregulation of some counter-regulatory proteins (such as osteoprotegerin) ongoing in the SOD1 bones and indicate cell senescence and metabolic reprogramming (highlighted by E2F, oxidative phosphorylation, and glycolysis genes), and the dysregulation of several mediators, such as Igf1, Notch, Tgfb1, and Bmp/Gdf10 signaling, as mechanistic bases for the bone phenotype.

Osteoblasts from SOD1 animals exhibit defects in differentiation and extracellular matrix organization in vitro. The bulk bone transcriptome identifies at the molecular level several pathogenic pathways potentially involved in the early disruption of bone architecture in ALS animals. However, whether these mechanistic events are set in motion by external triggers, such as muscle dysfunction or hypothalamic alteration, or are intrinsic to bone cell lineages, has not been addressed. To investigate this point, we isolated osteoblasts from femora of WT or SOD1 animals at the age of P45, and we maintained them in culture for 6 weeks (Figure 5A), to wash out, at least in part, systemic influences. We cultured samples from 6 WT and 6 SOD1 animals, but 3 WT samples did not pass quality control for excessive ribosomal RNA contamination and/or insufficient RNA quantity. We then performed bulk RNA-seq to characterize their transcriptomic landscape.

Transcriptomic analysis of cultured osteoblasts from the P45 time point revFigure 5

Transcriptomic analysis of cultured osteoblasts from the P45 time point reveals defects in signaling, proliferation, and differentiation. (A) Schematic representation of experimental design for primary osteoblast isolation and culture from WT and SOD1(G93A) mice at P45. (B) PCA of WT (n = 3) and SOD1 (n = 6) osteoblasts showing clear transcriptional separation with PC1 accounting for 92.4% of variance. (C) Volcano plot showing 1,921 upregulated and 2,074 downregulated genes in SOD1 samples (adjusted P < 0.05, |log2FC| > 1). (D) GO enrichment analysis identifying key transcriptional alterations in SOD1 osteoblasts. (E) Heatmaps displaying normalized expression (z scores) of representative genes. (F) GSEA highlighting upregulated unfolded protein response and downregulated proliferation pathways in SOD1 osteoblasts. Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 with adjusted P < 0.05 and |log2FC| > 1. GO and GSEA analyses were performed with q value less than 0.05.

PCA demonstrated a stark distinction of SOD1 and WT osteoblasts, with the first principal component accounting for more than 92% of the overall variance (Figure 5B). Differential gene expression analysis revealed 1,921 upregulated and 2,074 downregulated genes in SOD1 osteoblasts (adjusted P < 0.05, |log2FC| > 1; Figure 5C).

Among the top downregulated genes, several key genes involved in osteogenesis and bone turnover were decreased in SOD1 osteoblasts. Notably, a significant downregulation of Fc receptor subunits (Fcgr2b and Fcgr3) was also detected, possibly connected to the role of immune complexes in regulating osteoblast maturation (33), together with the downregulation of subunits of the complement protein C1q (C1qc, C1qa). Furthermore, several genes involved in adhesion to matrix were also downregulated (Itgb2, Clec4n, Adgre1). On the other hand, among the top upregulated genes, we observed the glucose and glutamate degradative enzyme Ogdhl1 (pointing to a shift toward anaerobic metabolism), and Ttc39b (possibly involved in lipid metabolism). Among the transcription factors, we identified the upregulation of Schlafen family member 5 (Slfn5), promoting osteoblast differentiation (34), but at the same time also the upregulation of Ikzf1, whose upregulation may interfere with osteoblast lineage progression. The top upregulated genes also included the inflammasome component Nlrp3 and the complement receptor C5ar2, whose upregulation promotes inflammation in bone tissue, accelerating bone resorption (35).

Considering a broader set of GO categories (Figure 5D), SOD1 osteoblasts displayed gene signatures for competing or contrasting pathways: while BMP signaling was upregulated (at multiple levels), a simultaneous upregulation of suppressors of osteoblast differentiation was observed. Likewise, although anti-apoptotic programs were downregulated overall, cell division was also reduced, indicating an overall decrease in cell turnover or fitness. Most notably, downregulation of bone mineralization and ossification was observed. Thus, despite the upregulation of bone buildup gene modules, an overall downregulation of bone deposition modules was observed.

The detailed scrutiny of the altered GO modules (Figure 5E) revealed, among others, 5 distinct modules related to bone metabolism: SOD1 osteoblasts displayed the distinct upregulation of multiple genes related to the regulation of BMP signaling such as the osteogenic suppressors Smurf1 and Smurf2, and in particular the upregulation of multiple Smad genes (Smad3, Smad7, and Smad9). Overall, SOD1 osteoblasts showed the upregulation of genes suppressing osteoblast differentiation and bone deposition, such as Fgfr1. On the other hand, 2 downregulated gene modules in SOD1 osteoblasts included multiple genes involved in cell proliferation (24 genes, most notably Notch1) and ossification (31 genes). In the latter, several anabolic genes (Igf1, Igf2, Igfbp2, Igfbp5) and collagen genes (Col11a2, Col13a1) were included.

Furthermore, pathway analysis in SOD1 osteoblasts revealed enrichment of PI3K-Akt and Wnt signaling in osteoblast cell culture (Supplemental Figure 2). Among bulk bone samples, oxidative phosphorylation was one of the few pathways significantly upregulated in SOD1 mice (Figure 4F). These changes indicate altered WNT/PI3K-Akt activity and mitochondrial stress already at the presymptomatic stage.

Finally, pathway analysis in GSEA (Figure 5F) highlighted the upregulation of unfolded protein response in SOD1 osteoblasts (a signature of cell response to misfolded SOD1) (36), coherent with the Smad upregulation (37). Conversely, among the pathways with negative correlation with genotypes (i.e., downregulated in SOD1), we identified IL-JAK signaling (related to bone morphogenesis), E2F (associated with senescence), complement, and G2M checkpoint; most notably, these categories also appeared in the bone bulk transcriptome.

We expanded our in vitro assessment of bone deposition/resorption processes with an assay directed at exploring osteoclast function and differentiation. We differentiated bone marrow cells from WT and SOD1(G93A) mice at P45 and P110 under osteoclastogenic conditions and quantified TRAP-positive multinucleated cells. SOD1-derived cultures from P45 mice displayed significantly higher osteoclast numbers compared with WT (Supplemental Figure 1, C and D); a similar trend was also observed for cells isolated at P110.

Taken together, the transcriptome data of the osteoblasts cultured for 6 weeks in vitro demonstrate a number of alterations in bone deposition and remodeling pathways, in particular BMP signaling, indicating at least a strong contribution of cell-autonomous disturbances to the overall bone phenotype. Two major disturbances in core cell biology, namely misfolded protein response and E2F transcription factor pathway activation, may underlie the altered bone-related phenotypes and indicate that cell stress and cell senescence may contribute to the SOD1-associated bone phenotype.

Increased cell senescence in presymptomatic ALS bones. We set out to explore the hypothesis of an ongoing accelerated senescence in the SOD1 bone cells, considering bulk bone and in vitro osteoblast transcriptomes. First, we exploited the recent demonstration of the age-dependent upregulation of the ectodysplasin A2 receptor (EDA2R) (38). Eda2r itself was significantly upregulated in both the bulk bone and osteoblasts from SOD1 animals (Figure 6A). Next, we defined the gene set predicted to be associated with Eda2r (GeneMANIA; Figure 6B) (39) and assessed the expression of these genes in the transcriptome datasets (Figure 6C). Several of the genes included in the Eda2r network were significantly altered in the ALS bone: the most notable is Tnfrsf14 (HVEM), the receptor for LIGHT/TNFSF14, whose ligand deficiency has been shown to impair osteoblast differentiation and decrease bone mass (41). Interestingly, the Eda2r gene network signature in cultured osteoblasts only partially overlapped the bulk-bone one: C1qb was also downregulated in the cultured cells, together with Tnfrsf14; on the other hand, Tnfrsf11a (Rank) was strongly downregulated in the osteoblasts (but barely in the bulk bone), and other genes (Acan, Gpr82, Tnfrsf19, previously associated with bone mass) (42) displayed opposite upregulation. Taken together, the Eda2r gene signature supports the accelerated aging phenotype but with uneven representation in bulk bone and cultured cells, possibly indicating non-cell-autonomous mechanisms.

Transcriptomic alterations and cellular senescence in SOD1(G93A) bulk bonesFigure 6

Transcriptomic alterations and cellular senescence in SOD1(G93A) bulk bones and osteoblasts. (A) Eda2r expression in bulk bone and cultured osteoblasts at presymptomatic stage (P45). Eda2r is significantly upregulated in SOD1(G93A) mice compared with WT controls in both conditions. (B) GeneMANIA network analysis illustrating interactions among significantly regulated genes from bulk bone RNA-seq. (C) Comparison of log2 fold changes for network genes between bulk bone and osteoblasts. (D) Immunofluorescence staining for p16INK4a (green) and RUNX2 (red) combined with DAPI (blue) in WT and SOD1 femoral bone sections at P45 and P110 stages. Arrows indicate osteoblasts; B denotes bone trabeculae. Scale bar: 20 μm. (E) Quantification of p16INK4a-positive osteoblasts showing progressive senescence in SOD1 mice. n = 3 per group. Statistical significance was determined using 1-way ANOVA followed by Šidák’s multiple-comparison test.

To independently evaluate the occurrence of increased senescence in the bones from ALS mice, we investigated the p16INK4a protein expression levels (an established marker of cellular senescence) (43) in femur histological samples from WT and SOD1 mice at presymptomatic (P45) and symptomatic (P110) stages. Regardless of age or genotype, p16INK4a immunoreactivity was primarily observed in the cellular layer adjacent to the mineralized matrix, indicating that it corresponds to osteoblasts (Figure 6D).

Notably, already at P45, SOD1 bones displayed a trend toward an increased percentage of p16INK4a-positive osteoblasts compared with WT, although they did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.0698; Figure 6E). At the symptomatic stage (P110), SOD1 mice exhibited a significantly higher percentage of p16INK4a-positive osteoblasts compared with age-matched WT controls (P = 0.0005; Figure 6E). WT animals also displayed an age-dependent increase in p16INK4a expression from P45 to P110 (P = 0.0011), consistent with the natural progression of cellular senescence during aging (44).

These findings align with transcriptomic data showing downregulation of E2F targets and G2M checkpoint in SOD1 bone and osteoblast cell culture and support the hypothesis that cellular senescence contributes to impaired bone formation in presymptomatic and symptomatic stages of ALS.

BMP signaling stimulation rescues osteogenic differentiation in SOD1 osteoblasts. The simultaneous detection of reduced osteoblast differentiation and increased senescence in both bulk bone and cultured osteoblast transcriptomes raised the hypothesis that increasing pro-osteogenic signaling may restore both phenotypes, since several transcription factors inducing osteogenic differentiation under BMP signaling (most notably ID1 and RUNX2) (45) are also suppressors of senescence (46, 47). To test the hypothesis, we cultured osteoblasts from WT or SOD1 animals in vitro for 6 weeks, and then we exposed them to BMP2 (or vehicle) for 7 days longer (Figure 7).

BMP2 treatment restores stress response and signaling deficits in SOD1(G93AFigure 7

BMP2 treatment restores stress response and signaling deficits in SOD1(G93A) osteoblasts. Western blot analysis and quantification of ID1 (A and F), RUNX2 (B and G), ALPL (C and H), phosphorylated eIF2α (D and I), and IRE1α (E and J) in primary osteoblasts from WT and SOD1 mice with and without BMP2 treatment. BMP2 restores ID1 expression in SOD1 osteoblasts. RUNX2 and ALPL showed no significant change in WT and SOD1 osteoblasts after BMP2 treatment. Each dot represents an individual biological replicate. n = 5–8 per group. Statistical significance was determined using 1-way ANOVA followed by Šidák’s multiple-comparison test.

First we assessed the protein level of the pro-osteogenic transcription factors ID1 and RUNX2. We detected a strong decrease in ID1 protein levels (matching the findings of the RNA-seq datasets) in vehicle-treated SOD1 osteoblasts compared with WT (Figure 7, A and F). Notably, the reduced ID1 expression in the SOD1 samples was rescued by BMP2 treatment. On the other hand, RUNX2 levels were largely unaffected by SOD1 expression or BMP2 treatment (Figure 7, B and G). Furthermore, we assessed the expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALPL), which is normally secreted into the bone matrix by osteoblasts to allow bone mineralization to take place. In WT osteoblasts, ALPL levels were stimulated by BMP2 treatment (Figure 7, C and H); conversely, osteoblasts from SOD1 animals displayed a very large variation of ALPL expression (on average, significantly higher than in WT), and showed a trend toward normalization upon BMP2 treatment.

We further considered a second hallmark of senescence, namely the phosphorylation of the translation factor eIF2α (48), also related to the unfolded protein response upregulated in SOD1 animals (49). Osteoblasts from the SOD1 animals did display increased levels of phosphorylated eIF2α (Figure 7, D and I) that were rescued by the BMP2 treatment; no effect of BMP2 was observed in the WT osteoblasts. Finally, we explored a potential mechanistic link between the unfolded protein response and ID1-related senescence, considering the expression of the ER stress/unfolded protein response component IRE1α (Figure 7, E and J), since IRE1α can degrade Id1 mRNA (50). Levels of IRE1α were substantially reduced in SOD1 osteoblasts compared with WT, but they were not modified by BMP2 treatment (Figure 7, E and J). Thus, cultured osteoblasts display two hallmarks of senescence (reduced ID1 expression and increased eIF2α phosphorylation), which can be corrected by stimulation of BMP signaling independently of the ER stress response.

Discussion

Our study provides architectural, histological, and molecular evidence for the early deterioration of bone tissue in the SOD1(G93A) mouse model of ALS associated with the accelerated appearance of a senescent phenotype in osteoblasts, reversible upon BMP stimulation. The combination of transcriptomes from bulk RNA from bones and of the transcriptome of long-term in vitro osteoblast culture suggests that sensitivity to osteogenic pathways, such as Wnt, BMP, and Notch, may be intrinsically altered in SOD1 osteoblasts in association with the occurrence of osteoblast senescence and unfolded protein response. These findings support the possibility of a cell-autonomous involvement of bone cells, associated with, but not necessarily dependent on, the muscle denervation and atrophy.

Our results are largely in agreement with what was previously reported (16, 17, 51), and provide further evidence beyond existing datasets of an earlier than expected bone involvement in SOD1 ALS. Zhu et al. (16) used the same SOD1(G93A) model and reported reduced trabecular and cortical bone, impaired osteoblast function, and increased osteoclastogenesis in 4-month-old mice with advanced muscle atrophy. At the symptomatic stage (P110), we observe similar changes, including trabecular loss, cortical thinning, loss of osteoblasts, and increased osteoclast activity. The main difference between the two studies concerns the presymptomatic stage. Both groups used high-resolution micro-CT, but different scanners, fixation protocols, and analysis workflows were applied (ethanol-fixed Scanco scans in Zhu et al. versus paraformaldehyde-fixed Skyscan scans with calibrated, threshold-based analysis in our study). Such differences can influence the sensitivity to detect early trabecular alterations.

Disruption of large-scale bone architecture and osteoporosis has been previously described in the context of human ALS patients (7), and ALS is a strong risk factor for bone mineralization defects and fractures (8). These alterations have been attributed to the reduced bone load, due to muscle denervation and paralysis, as bone is a highly mechanoresponsive tissue and bone mass gets lost upon disuse (52). In fact, earlier evidence (16) of bone involvement in SOD1 mice identified alterations only at fully symptomatic stage (but not at earlier stages) and only in load-bearing bones. In this case, a direct disruption of the mechanoresponsive sclerostin/Wnt signaling, reduced osteoblast proliferation, and a simultaneous increased osteoclast generation had been identified only in symptomatic animals, implying a bone phenotype secondary to the mechanical unloading (16). More recently, a cell-autonomous mitochondrial defect has been identified in SOD1 cultured osteocytes, associated with increased mitochondrial fission and fragmentation (17). This defect was recapitulated in an osteocytic cell line overexpressing mutant SOD1 and was partially compensated by the overexpression of a mitochondrial fission inhibitor (17), and was therefore independent of loading alterations.

In fact, we found that morphological changes in bone structure and alterations in biomechanical properties arise at a presymptomatic stage in SOD1 mice, preceding overt muscle denervation. Our results demonstrate that these differences persist and become more pronounced as the disease advances. However, the relationship between cortical thickness and maximum bending force is not exclusive, and it is influenced by factors other than cortical thickness itself, including trabecular architecture and matrix quality, partially dissociating biomechanics and micro-CT findings. At P45, cortical thickness is still similar between WT and SOD1 mice, but trabecular BMD and trabecular thickness are already reduced in SOD1 animals, which likely explains the strong decrease in maximum bending force. At P110, cortical thickness is clearly reduced in SOD1 mice, but changes in bone architecture and material properties mean that stiffness and maximum force do not change in a strictly parallel way; this pattern is consistent with Ko et al. (51), who reported reduced stiffness and strength in SOD1(G93A) mice at symptomatic stages. Our findings indicate that bone fragility is not merely a late, secondary phenomenon due to muscle atrophy and reduced mechanical load. Instead, a number of molecular and cellular factors, including cell-autonomous alterations in osteoblasts, appear to drive this process from the outset.

Bulk bone RNA-seq analysis indicated altering of the transcriptome, with upregulation of bone resorption pathways, negative regulators of bone formation, and cell senescence signatures. Downregulation of osteogenic mediators such as Igf1 and Tgfb1, coupled with reductions in Notch and Il6 signaling, provides a mechanistic framework for the observed diminution in osteoblast number and function. In agreement with previous work, our data indicate that Wnt-related pathways are altered in SOD1(G93A) bone. Zhu et al. reported reduced β-catenin and increased sclerostin in osteocytes of symptomatic G93A mice, consistent with inhibition of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling at later disease stages. In our presymptomatic osteoblast cultures, GO analysis shows enrichment of Wnt and PI3K-Akt signaling and a decrease in “negative regulation of canonical Wnt signaling” (Supplemental Figure 2). Taken together, these findings suggest that Wnt signaling is altered in SOD1(G93A) bone; however, the upregulated Wnt signaling may correspond to a homeostatic response to insufficient osteoblast activity.

Our results also reinforce the concept that, beyond mechanical unloading, intrinsic factors such as oxidative stress (17) and protein misfolding likely contribute to bone pathology in ALS.

Consistent with a high-turnover state in the symptomatic stage, revealed by the osteoclast differentiation transcriptional module and by the in vitro osteoclast differentiation assay, serum CTX-I showed a tendency to increase and PINP levels were significantly elevated in SOD1 mice at P110 (Supplemental Figure 1, A and B), in agreement with previous reports of higher CTX-I in SOD1(G93A) mice and increased CTX and PINP in ALS patients (16, 53). Serum biomarkers do not reveal early alteration in bone resorption, consistent with the early phenotype being related with osteoblast differentiation and matrix deposition rather than degradation.

With osteoblast culture from P45 SOD1 and WT mice, we identified additional transcriptional alterations that occurred before the central nervous system or altered muscle changes. Specifically, osteoblasts from SOD1 animals exhibited dysregulated BMP signaling, a disrupted balance between pro- and anti-osteogenic factors, and a clear signature of the unfolded protein response. Furthermore, our bulk bone transcriptome shows enrichment of oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 4F), pointing to altered mitochondrial function and cellular stress at the tissue level. This is in line with the study by Wang et al. (17), who reported abnormal mitochondrial morphology and function in SOD1(G93A) osteocytes. Taken together, these findings support the idea that mitochondrial stress, along with disturbed Wnt/PI3K-Akt signaling, is a common feature of the SOD1(G93A) bone phenotype, even if the exact readouts differ between disease stages, cell types, and experimental settings.

This supports a cell-autonomous mechanism by which mutant SOD1 impairs osteoblast function. Consistent with this, the canonical osteoblast transcription factor ID1 is downregulated (although RUNX2 is not) in SOD1 mice, and normalized by BMP2 stimulation. Likewise, ALPL levels are high in SOD1 mice (coherent with the upregulation occurring upon ineffective bone mineralization/deposition seen in other conditions) (54, 55), confirming the overall pattern of ineffective osteoblast activity, despite active pro-osteogenic signaling (such as WNT and BMP) in the presymptomatic stage.

In parallel, the downregulation of genes involved in E2F targets and G2M checkpoint corroborates the senescence phenotype, which we further confirmed by the increased expression of p16INK4a in SOD1 osteoblasts. The presence of this senescent state as early as P45 underscores an acceleration of bone cell aging processes in the context of ALS, echoing similar phenomena observed in other rapidly progressing neurodegenerative conditions (44, 56). Furthermore, the osteoblast senescence observed in the ALS SOD1 mouse shares similarities to the cellular senescence observed in advanced age (57), indicating a convergence between neurodegeneration-associated and age-associated bone disruption. Osteoblast senescence plays a critical role in the decline of bone health during aging. As osteoblasts undergo senescence, a state of irreversible growth arrest, they lose their functional capacity to form bone (58). This process is a key driver of age-associated bone disorders such as osteoporosis. Furthermore, senescent osteoblasts not only exhibit reduced matrix-producing and mineralizing activity but also secrete proinflammatory and catabolic factors known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) (56). This “inflammaging” secretome disrupts the local bone microenvironment, promoting osteoclast activation and bone resorption while impairing the differentiation and function of neighboring osteoprogenitor cells (58). In our study, we could not clearly identify increased SASP factors in P45 SOD1 osteoblasts, which might indicate that the SASP phenotype appears later after induction of senescence. However, we could clearly show a defective osteoblast differentiation program in P45 cells, and we were able to rescue that phenotype by BMP treatment, which is known to be one of the strongest osteoanabolic mediators (57). Interestingly, we also found dysregulation of the complement system in P45 SOD1 bones and osteoblasts. The complement system, traditionally known for its role in immune defense, also significantly influences bone biology (32). Complement components such as C3a and C5a modulate osteoclast and osteoblast activity, thereby regulating bone remodeling. Activation of the complement cascade promotes osteoclastogenesis, contributing to bone resorption, especially in inflammatory conditions. Emerging evidence highlights its involvement in fracture healing, osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis (35, 59). However, downregulation of complement components like the TCC can also cause bone loss (60). Thus, the complement system acts as a critical immunological link between inflammation and bone metabolism, which might be involved in the early effects of SOD1 mutation in ALS mice. But this is only one of many pathways we identified in this study that seem to play a role in early bone pathology in SOD1 ALS mice.

Several limitations should be considered in our study. First, approximately 90% of ALS cases are sporadic with no clear genetic cause, while only 10% are familial, with SOD1 alleles accounting for 20% of these familial cases. Our study exclusively used male mice. Male SOD1(G93A) mice typically show more consistent disease progression and less phenotypic variability compared with females, which often demonstrate a more variable disease course with hormonal influences that potentially confound results. The identification of cellular senescence pathways as potential mediators of mutant SOD1 effects on bone suggests that senolytics could provide an entry point to modify the ALS-associated bone phenotype. Finally, we did not examine alternative ALS models such as FUS or TDP-43 mouse models. TDP-43 mouse models typically display a more protracted disease progression, which would require longer experimental timelines to observe comparable pathological stages. FUS models, while valuable for studying RNA processing defects in ALS, often show variable penetrance and more subtle motor phenotypes. The SOD1(G93A) model was selected because of its well-characterized phenotype and robust neuromuscular manifestations, providing an optimal foundation for investigating bone pathology in relation to denervation processes.

Our findings hold important implications for the clinical management of ALS, as bone fragility and fractures can significantly worsen the quality of life of patients, whose mobility is already compromised. The demonstration of an early-onset and partly cell-autonomous defect in bone metabolism suggests that therapeutic strategies aiming to preserve bone mass (potentially through targeted interventions on senescence, BMP/Notch/Igf1 pathways, or protein homeostasis) might need to be instituted early in the disease course.

Methods

Sex as a biological variable. This study exclusively examined male mice. Male SOD1(G93A) mice were selected because they exhibit faster and more consistent disease progression with less phenotypic variability compared with female mice, in which hormonal influences can confound results. The findings are expected to be relevant to both sexes, although this was not experimentally tested.

Animals. All experiments were conducted using the transgenic B6SJL-Tg(SOD1*G93A)1Gur/J mouse line obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (stock 002726; this line exhibits fast disease progression due to high transgene copy number, with median survival of approximately 130 days). Hemizygous mice expressing the mutant SOD1(G93A) transgene display an ALS-like phenotype characterized by progressive neuromuscular impairment due to high transgene copy number. Animals were maintained on a mixed B6SJL genetic background. Mice at postnatal day 45 (P45) were considered presymptomatic, exhibiting no overt signs of motor impairment, whereas animals at day 110 (P110) were classified as symptomatic, showing clear neuromuscular deficits as reported previously (61, 62). The study comprised 4 experimental groups based on genotype and age: SOD1G93A (SOD1) at presymptomatic (P45) and symptomatic (P110) stages, and WT mice at these corresponding time points. All animal experiments were conducted following institutional animal care guidelines established by the Tierforschungszentrum at the University of Ulm, and were approved by the Regierungspräsidium Tübingen under license number 1440.

Biomechanics. Immediately after euthanasia, femora underwent biomechanical testing using a destructive 3-point bending test in a universal material testing machine, Zwick Z10 (Zwick Roell), to evaluate mechanical properties, following previously established protocol (63). To enable stable positioning and consistent loading geometry, the proximal end of each femur was embedded in an aluminum cylinder, while the femoral condyles remained unfixed on the bending support, as described previously (63). In the first 2 loading cycles, a gradually increasing load was applied at 2 mm/min to the midpoint of the bone shaft, reaching a maximum of 4 N. Flexural rigidity (E*I) was calculated from the slope (k) of the linear region in the load-displacement curve. In the third loading cycle, bones were loaded until failure. The 3-point bending test used a total support span length of 20.0 mm (length from the proximal to the distal support point). This span length was achievable as a result of the proximal embedding, which extends the effective testing length beyond the anatomical bone dimensions. The length from the proximal support to the loading nose was measured for each individual animal and used for the calculation of the flexural rigidity as described previously (63). The loading nose was centered at the mid diaphysis, and a constant crosshead speed of 2 mm/min was applied. Fixture alignment was verified before testing, and calibration of the load cell was performed on the day of experiments.

Micro–computed tomography. Femora were collected from 4 groups of mice: WT P45, WT 110, SOD1 P45, and SOD1 P110. Samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 48 hours and stored in 0.5% PFA for long-term preservation. Bone mineral density (BMD) and tissue mineral density (TMD) were assessed using the Skyscan 1172 high-resolution ex vivo micro-CT system (Bruker), operated at 50 kV and 200 μA with an isotropic voxel size of 8 μm. Projection images were reconstructed with automatic misalignment compensation and a Hounsfield unit range of –999 to 10,000. BMD calibration was performed with 2 hydroxyapatite phantoms (250 and 750 mg HA/cm3), and fixed density thresholds were applied for segmentation of trabecular (394 mg HA/cm3) and cortical bone (642 mg HA/cm3). For femur analysis, the region of interest was defined at 0.7 mm from the distal growth plate for trabecular bone and 3.3 mm for cortical bone. Trabecular bone parameters included bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV %), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), and trabecular number (Tb.N), while cortical bone was analyzed for cortical tissue mineral density (Ct.TMD) and cortical thickness (Ct.Th), following the ASBMR histomorphometry nomenclature committee guidelines (64). In the representative 3D renderings, weakly mineralized bone is displayed in red, whereas moderately mineralized bone is displayed in yellow and highly mineralized bone in blue.

Serum CTX-I and PINP assay. Serum samples were collected from WT and SOD1 mice at P45 and P110. Blood was centrifuged at 1,000g for 10 minutes, and serum was stored at –80°C until analysis. C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) was measured using the RatLaps (CTX-I) EIA kit (IDS, AC-06F1). Twenty microliters of serum was analyzed in duplicate following the manufacturer’s protocol with overnight incubation at 2°C–8°C. N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) was measured using the Rat/Mouse PINP EIA kit (IDS, AC-33F1). Serum samples were diluted 1:10, and 5 μL was analyzed in duplicate with 1-hour incubation at room temperature. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm (reference 650 nm), and results are presented as nanograms per milliliter.

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining was performed to identify osteoclasts in trabecular bone paraffin sections from presymptomatic (P45) and symptomatic (P110) SOD1 and WT mice. Trabecular bone samples were decalcified in EDTA-based solution (Usedecalc, Medite) at 20°C for 2 weeks. Paraffin sections were incubated for 90 minutes at 37°C in a freshly prepared substrate solution containing 40 mmol/L sodium acetate, 10 mmol/L sodium tartrate, 1.6 mmol/L fast red-violet, and 700 mmol/L naphthol (all reagents from Sigma-Aldrich), adjusted to pH 5.0. Subsequently, sections were briefly counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich) for nuclear visualization. Osteoclast quantification was performed using the OsteoMeasure analysis system (OsteoMetrics Inc.). Specifically, osteoclasts were quantified in the secondary spongiosa of the distal femoral metaphysis, defined as the trabecular compartment located 200–480 μm proximal to the distal femoral growth plate, excluding the primary spongiosa. TRAP-positive multinucleated cells in direct contact with trabecular bone surfaces were counted as osteoclasts. Results were expressed as the number of osteoclasts per bone perimeter (N.Oc/B.Pm; TRAP-positive cells/mm bone surface), representing osteoclast abundance relative to the examined bone surface, and the surface of the osteoclasts on the bone surface (Oc.S/BS).

Immunohistochemistry. Decalcified samples were dehydrated in increasing ethanol concentrations and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections (4 μm) were deparaffinized, and antigen retrieval was carried out in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 95°C for 20 minutes. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% H2O2 for 10 minutes, and nonspecific binding was minimized using 5% normal goat serum for 1 hour at room temperature. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary rabbit RUNX2 (Cell Signaling Technology, S8486; 1:100 dilution) antibody. After washing, sections were incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-3840) for 30 minutes, followed by incubation with ABC reagent (Vector Laboratories, PK-6100) for an additional 30 minutes. Antibody binding was visualized using NovaRed chromogen (Vector Laboratories, SK-4800). Subsequently, sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin, rinsed under running tap water, dehydrated in ethanol gradients, cleared in xylene, and mounted using DPX mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich, 44581). For quantitative analysis, RUNX2-positive osteoblasts lining trabecular bone surfaces were counted within the secondary spongiosa of the distal femoral metaphysis, defined as the trabecular compartment located 200–480 μm proximal to the distal femoral growth plate, excluding the primary spongiosa.

Immunofluorescence staining. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections (4 μm) were deparaffinized in xylene (2 × 5 minutes) and rehydrated through a graded ethanol series (2 × 100%, 90%, 80%, 70%, 50%; 5 minutes each), followed by rinsing in distilled water. Antigen retrieval was performed by heating of sections in citrate buffer (10 mM sodium citrate, pH 6.0) at 95°C for 20 minutes in a water bath, followed by cooling to room temperature in the same buffer for 20 minutes. Sections were then washed 3 times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 5 minutes each).

Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TBS-T containing 1% goat serum for 1 hour at room temperature. After blocking, sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit anti-CDKN2A/p16INK4a (Abcam, ab189034; 1:100) and mouse anti-RUNX2 (Abcam, ab766956; 1:100) in PBS with 1% goat serum. After primary antibody incubation, slides were washed 3 times in PBS (5 minutes each) and incubated with an Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Invitrogen, A-11008; 1:500 in PBS with 1% goat serum) and Alexa Fluor 633–conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Invitrogen, A-21050; 1:500 in PBS with 1% goat serum) for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich; 1:5,000 in PBS) for 1 minute at room temperature. Sections were then washed again 3 times in PBS (5 minutes each) and mounted with ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (Invitrogen, P36930).

For quantification of osteoblast senescence, p16INK4a-positive osteoblasts were counted in the secondary spongiosa of the distal femoral metaphysis. The region of interest (secondary spongiosa) was defined as the trabecular compartment located 200–480 μm proximal to the distal femoral growth plate, excluding the primary spongiosa. Osteoblasts were identified as RUNX2-positive cuboidal cells lining the trabecular surface, and data are expressed as the percentage of p16INK4a-positive osteoblasts relative to the total number of osteoblasts per field.

Osteoblast cell culture and BMP2 treatment. Primary osteoblasts were isolated from long bones using a previously described method (65). Briefly, the long bones (2 femora, 2 tibiae, 2 humeri, 2 radii/ulnae) were isolated from WT and SOD1, P45 and P110 male mice. The bones were cleared of soft tissue under laminar flow and washed with PBS. Subsequently, the epiphyses were removed, and the bones were centrifuged (13/500g, 1 minute, room temperature) to remove the bone marrow. The bones were then cut into small pieces (1–2 mm2) and incubated with collagenase IV (1 mg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in alpha minimum essential medium (α-MEM; Lonza) for 1 hour in a shaking water bath at 37°C. After washing twice with PBS, the bone pieces were transferred to 56 cm2 culture dishes containing complete medium (α-MEM containing 15% fetal bovine serum [Sigma-Aldrich], 1% penicillin/streptomycin [Thermo Fisher Scientific], and 1% l-glutamine [Thermo Fisher Scientific]) and cultured for approximately 4 weeks. The bone pieces were gently washed out with PBS, and the cells from each mouse were trypsinized and seeded in two 175 cm2 flasks (T175). Once they reached 80% confluence, the cells were ready for use in experiments.

For the BMP2 differentiation experiment, osteoblasts were cultured in 12-well plates at a density of 20,000 cells per well. Differentiation was induced by supplementation of the medium with 50 μg/mL ascorbic acid and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate (both from Sigma-Aldrich). In BMP2-treated conditions, recombinant human BMP2 (100 ng/mL; R&D Systems) was added to the differentiation medium and refreshed every 48 hours. Cells were cultured for 7 days before Western blot analysis.

Osteoclast cell culture. Bone marrow–derived osteoclasts were generated from long bones of WT and SOD1(G93A) mice at P45 and P110. Briefly, femora and tibiae were dissected free of soft tissue under sterile conditions and washed in PBS. The epiphyses were removed, and bone marrow was flushed out using α-minimum essential medium (α-MEM; Lonza) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% l-glutamine (both from Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cell suspension was passed through a 70 μm cell strainer, centrifuged (300g, 5 minutes, room temperature), and resuspended in complete medium.

For precursor generation, bone marrow cells were seeded into tissue culture flasks at a density of 2 × 106 cells/mL in complete α-MEM containing recombinant murine macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF; 30 ng/mL; R&D Systems) and cultured for 3 days at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Nonadherent cells were removed by washing with PBS. Adherent macrophage-like precursor cells were detached using Accutase (Sigma-Aldrich), counted, and used for differentiation.

For osteoclast differentiation, precursor cells were plated in 96-well plates at 5 × 104 cells per well in complete α-MEM supplemented with M-CSF (30 ng/mL) and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL; 50 ng/mL; R&D Systems). Medium containing cytokines was changed every 2–3 days. After 5–7 days, cells were fixed in 4% PFA for 10 minutes and stained for TRAP using an Acid Phosphatase Leukocyte Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. TRAP-positive multinucleated cells with 3 or more nuclei were defined as osteoclasts and counted under a light microscope. Osteoclast formation was expressed as the mean number of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells per well from technical replicates for each mouse.

Western blot. For Western blot analysis, cells were washed with cold PBS and lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% NaN3, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5% Triton X-100) supplemented with protease inhibitors (cOmplete Mini, Roche). Total protein concentrations were measured using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with BSA as standard. Equal amounts of protein were separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad) using wet-transfer procedures. Membranes were blocked in PBS containing 5% BSA for 1 hour at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in PBS supplemented with 5% BSA and 0.05% Tween 20. The following primary antibodies were used: phospho-eIF2α (Ser51) (9721, Cell Signaling Technology; 1:1,000), IRE1α (14C10) rabbit monoclonal antibody (3294, Cell Signaling Technology; 1:1,000), anti-ID1 (B-8) (sc-133104, Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:100), RUNX2 (ab766956; 1:1,000), ALPL (AF2910; 1:1,000), anti–β-tubulin (ab179513, Abcam; 1:5,000), and β-actin monoclonal antibody (66009-1-Ig, Proteintech; 1:5,000). After washing, membranes were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Bio-Rad) diluted 1:5,000 in PBS containing 5% BSA and 0.05% Tween 20. Protein bands were visualized using chemiluminescence (Bio-Rad, Clarity Western ECL Substrate), and signal intensity was quantified with ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare). Target protein levels were normalized to β-actin or β-tubulin as loading controls.

RNA-seq and bioinformatics analysis. RNA isolation was performed with the RNeasy kit (QIAGEN), and RNA concentration and integrity were assessed with a 2100 Bioanalyzer and the RNA 6000 Nano kit (Agilent Technologies). Only RNA samples with an A260/A280 ratio of 1.9–2.0 and an RNA integrity number (RIN) greater than 7.0 were used for sequencing. RNA sequencing was performed by Genewiz (Azenta Life Sciences) using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. The raw sequencing data were processed using featureCounts (66) to obtain sequenced reads. Sequence adapters and low-quality reads were removed using Trimmomatic (67), and quality control analysis was conducted with FastQC (x https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/).

Subsequently, reads were mapped to the mouse reference genome (GRCm39) using STAR (68), and gene expression levels were quantified using featureCounts. Raw counts were used for transcript quantification. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed in RStudio with pcaExplorer to assess sample variability and reproducibility. The distribution of differentially expressed genes was visualized using a volcano plot (log2FC ≥ 1.0 or ≤ –1.0, FDR < 0.05) generated in R using RStudio with pheatmap (RRID:SCR_016418). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was conducted using the PANTHER Classification System, and the top GO clusters from up- and downregulated genes were ranked and visualized based on –log10(FDR) in R studio with ggplot2 (69).

Statistics. Data are presented as box-and-whisker plots, showing the minimum to maximum range with all individual data points superimposed. Statistical differences between 2 groups were analyzed using an unpaired homoscedastic 2-tailed Student’s t test, while comparisons across multiple conditions were assessed using a 1-way ANOVA followed by Šidák’s multiple-comparison test. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Study approval. All animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the Regierungspräsidium Tübingen under license number 1440. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the institutional animal care guidelines established by the Tierforschungszentrum at the University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Data availability. The sequence data are publicly available in the European Nucleotide Archive under accession number PRJEB100793 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB100793). Supporting data values are provided in the Supplemental Data Values file. All other data are available upon request.

Author contributions

BÖ performed the transcriptomic and bioinformatic analysis. DW contributed the breeding designs, animal husbandry, and reporting. SA performed the dissections. JMR performed the biomechanical and microtomography analyses. DG prepared the samples for the primary osteoblast cell cultures. SN performed the immunofluorescence staining. JHW, JSZ, AI, MHL, and FR designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the first version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Funding support
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) under the EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND) within the High-resolution approaches to Cellular pathology in ALS (HiCALS; BMBF-01ED2302) and Digital Comprehensive Care for Motor Neuron Disease (DC4MND; BMBF-01ED2301) consortia.
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grants 545426613 and 521487152 (to FR).
  • DFG grant 251293561 (to MHL, FR, and AI).
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE)–Ulm core funding (to FR).
Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Unedited blot and gel images

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge infrastructural support by the High Performance and Cloud Computing Group at the Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung of the University of Tübingen, the state of Baden-Württemberg through bwHPC, and the DFG.

Address correspondence to: Francesco Roselli or Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Center for Biomedical Research (ZBF), Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Phone: 0049.0731.500.63147; Email: francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de (FR). Phone: 0049.0731.500.55324; Email: melanie.haffner-luntzer@uni-ulm.de (MHL).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Copyright: © 2026, Özkan et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: JCI Insight. 2026;11(5):e197475.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.197475.

References
  1. Brown RH, Al-Chalabi A. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):162–172.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Rowland LP, Shneider NA. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(22):1688–1700.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Guillot SJ, et al. Early-onset sleep alterations found in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis are ameliorated by orexin antagonist in mouse models. Sci Transl Med. 2024;17(783):eadm7580.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Dorst J, et al. Metabolic alterations precede neurofilament changes in presymptomatic ALS gene carriers. EBioMedicine. 2023;90:104521.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Steyn FJ, et al. Hypermetabolism in ALS is associated with greater functional decline and shorter survival. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(10):1016–1023.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Kolde G, et al. Skin involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet. 1996;347(9010):1226–1227.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Caplliure-Llopis J, et al. Poor bone quality in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2020;11:599216.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Morini E, et al. Bone health status in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cross-sectional study on the role of the trabecular bone score and its implications in neurorehabilitation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):2923.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Compston JE, et al. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019;393(10169):364–376.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Ahmad M, et al. Mechanical induction of osteoanabolic Wnt1 promotes osteoblast differentiation via Plat. FASEB J. 2024;38(4):e23489.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Wilson HM, et al. Notch signaling in osteoblast progenitor cells is required for BMP-induced bone formation. Bone. 2025;194:117425.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Aghili ZS, et al. Growth hormone signaling and clinical implications: from molecular to therapeutic perspectives. Mol Biol Rep. 2025;52(1):202.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Prystaz K, et al. Distinct effects of IL-6 classic and trans-signaling in bone fracture healing. Am J Pathol. 2018;188(2):474–490.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. El-Masri BM, et al. Mapping RANKL- and OPG-expressing cells in bone tissue: the bone surface cells as activators of osteoclastogenesis and promoters of the denosumab rebound effect. Bone Res. 2024;12(1):62.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Schoppa AM, et al. Osteoblast lineage Sod2 deficiency leads to an osteoporosis-like phenotype in mice. Dis Model Mech. 2022;15(5):dmm049392.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Zhu K, et al. Impaired bone homeostasis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mice with muscle atrophy. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(13):8081–8094.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Wang H, et al. ALS-associated mutation SOD1G93A leads to abnormal mitochondrial dynamics in osteocytes. Bone. 2018;106:126–138.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Ouali Alami N, et al. NF-κB activation in astrocytes drives a stage-specific beneficial neuroimmunological response in ALS. EMBO J. 2018;37(16):e98697.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Patton DM, et al. The relationship between whole bone stiffness and strength is age and sex dependent. J Biomech. 2019;83:125–133.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Zarjou A, et al. Ferritin ferroxidase activity: a potent inhibitor of osteogenesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(1):164–172.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Taubmann J, et al. Metabolic reprogramming of osteoclasts represents a therapeutic target during the treatment of osteoporosis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):21020.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Gartland A, et al. Blockade of the pore-forming P2X7 receptor inhibits formation of multinucleated human osteoclasts in vitro. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003;73(4):361–369.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Iyer S, et al. Role of SHIP1 in bone biology. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1280:11–14.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Zhang Z, et al. TGF-β1 promotes the osteoinduction of human osteoblasts via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR/S6K1 signalling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2019;19(5):3505–3518.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  25. Cornish J, et al. Interleukin-18 is a novel mitogen of osteogenic and chondrogenic cells. Endocrinology. 2003;144(4):1194–1201.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Engin F, et al. Dimorphic effects of Notch signaling in bone homeostasis. Nat Med. 2008;14(3):299–305.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Matsumoto Y, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-3b (BMP-3b) inhibits osteoblast differentiation via Smad2/3 pathway by counteracting Smad1/5/8 signaling. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;350(1):78–86.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Kodama N, et al. BMP3b regulates bone mass by inhibiting BMP signaling. Bone. 2024;190:117303.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Kaneko H, et al. Direct stimulation of osteoclastic bone resorption by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and expression of BMP receptors in mature osteoclasts. Bone. 2000;27(4):479–486.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Pham L, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 signaling in osteoclasts is negatively regulated by the BMP antagonist, twisted gastrulation. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112(3):793–803.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Xie Q, et al. E2F transcription factor 1 regulates cellular and organismal senescence by inhibiting Forkhead box O transcription factors. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(49):34205–34213.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Mödinger Y, et al. Complement involvement in bone homeostasis and bone disorders. Semin Immunol. 2018;37:53–65.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Negishi-Koga T, et al. Immune complexes regulate bone metabolism through FcRγ signalling. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6637.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Sen B, et al. Intranuclear actin structure modulates mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells. 2017;35(6):1624–1635.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Kovtun A, et al. Complement receptors C5aR1 and C5aR2 act differentially during the early immune response after bone fracture but are similarly involved in bone repair. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14061.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Saxena S, et al. A role for motoneuron subtype-selective ER stress in disease manifestations of FALS mice. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(5):627–636.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Xu H, et al. Unfolded protein response is required for the definitive endodermal specification of mouse embryonic stem cells via Smad2 and β-catenin signaling. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(38):26290–26301.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Barbera MC, et al. Increased ectodysplasin-A2-receptor EDA2R is a ubiquitous hallmark of aging and mediates parainflammatory responses. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):1898.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Warde-Farley D, et al. The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(web server issue):W214–W220.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Yang W, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals multiple immune cell subpopulations promote the formation of abnormal bone microenvironment in osteoporosis. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):29493.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Brunetti G, et al. Impairment of bone remodeling in LIGHT/TNFSF14-deficient mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(4):704–719.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Pei YF, et al. Joint association analysis identified 18 new loci for bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(6):1086–1094.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Krishnamurthy J, et al. Ink4a/Arf expression is a biomarker of aging. J Clin Invest. 2004;114(9):1299–1307.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Farr JN, et al. Targeting cellular senescence prevents age-related bone loss in mice. Nat Med. 2017;23(9):1072–1079.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Katagiri T, et al. Identification of a BMP-responsive element in Id1, the gene for inhibition of myogenesis. Genes Cells. 2002;7(9):949–960.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Alani RM, et al. Id1 regulation of cellular senescence through transcriptional repression of p16/Ink4a. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(14):7812–7816.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Zheng W, et al. Regulation of cellular senescence and p16(INK4a) expression by Id1 and E47 proteins in human diploid fibroblast. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(30):31524–31532.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Payea MJ, et al. Senescence suppresses the integrated stress response and activates a stress-remodeled secretory phenotype. Mol Cell. 2024;84(22):4454–4469.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Saxena S, et al. Neuroprotection through excitability and mTOR required in ALS motoneurons to delay disease and extend survival. Neuron. 2013;80(1):80–96.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Blazanin N, et al. ER stress and distinct outputs of the IRE1α RNase control proliferation and senescence in response to oncogenic Ras. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(37):9900–9905.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Ko FC, et al. Structural and functional properties of bone are compromised in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mice. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2018;19(5-6):457–462.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Haffner-Luntzer M, et al. Mechanobiology of bone remodeling and fracture healing in the aged organism. Innov Surg Sci. 2016;1(2):57–63.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  53. Sooragonda BG, et al. Bone mineral density and body composition in males with motor neuron disease: a study from teaching hospital in southern part of India. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2021;24(2):211–216.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Couchourel D, et al. Altered mineralization of human osteoarthritic osteoblasts is attributable to abnormal type I collagen production. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(5):1438–1450.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Hilal G, et al. Osteoblast-like cells from human subchondral osteoarthritic bone demonstrate an altered phenotype in vitro: possible role in subchondral bone sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(5):891–899.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Gresham RCH, et al. Compliant substrates mitigate the senescence associated phenotype of stress induced mesenchymal stromal cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2024;112(5):770–780.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Akiyama T, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein signaling: the pathway and its regulation. Genetics. 2024;226(2):iyad200.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Ding P, et al. Osteocytes regulate senescence of bone and bone marrow. Elife. 2022;11:e81480.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Mödinger Y, et al. Role of the complement system in the response to orthopedic biomaterials. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3367.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Mödinger Y, et al. Reduced terminal complement complex formation in mice manifests in low bone mass and impaired fracture healing. Am J Pathol. 2019;189(1):147–161.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Bączyk M, et al. Synaptic restoration by cAMP/PKA drives activity-dependent neuroprotection to motoneurons in ALS. J Exp Med. 2020;217(8):e20191734.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Gurney ME, et al. Motor neuron degeneration in mice that express a human Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase mutation. Science. 1994;264(5166):1772–1775.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Röntgen V, et al. Fracture healing in mice under controlled rigid and flexible conditions using an adjustable external fixator. J Orthop Res. 2010;28(11):1456–1462.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Dempster DW, et al. Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(1):2–17.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Bakker AD, Klein-Nulend J. Osteoblast isolation from murine calvaria and long bones. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;816:19–29.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Liao Y, et al. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(7):923–30.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Bolger AM, et al. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Dobin A, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag; 2016.
Version history
  • Version 1 (January 22, 2026): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (March 9, 2026): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts