Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Agnostic polygenic prediction of weight loss after bariatric surgery
Bastien Vallée Marcotte, Juan de Toro-Martín, André Tchernof, Louis Pérusse, Simon Marceau, Marie-Claude Vohl
Bastien Vallée Marcotte, Juan de Toro-Martín, André Tchernof, Louis Pérusse, Simon Marceau, Marie-Claude Vohl
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Gastroenterology Genetics Metabolism

Agnostic polygenic prediction of weight loss after bariatric surgery

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

A large interindividual variability in weight loss outcomes following bariatric surgery is reported. To ensure optimal management of patients, it is crucial to accurately identify candidates most likely to benefit the most from the intervention. Since genetic variants largely contribute to surgery response, polygenic scores (PGS) derived from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) could constitute valuable tools for clinical decision making. We developed and evaluated PGS to predict the weight loss response in 540 patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m2 or higher who underwent biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Summary statistics derived from BMI-derived GWAS, together with summary statistics from previously published GWAS of BMI and adiposity features, were used to construct, evaluate, and benchmark weight loss PGS. The full-adjusted BMI PGS model built in the entire cohort explained 39.6% of the mean-over-time excessive body weight loss (%EBWL), while the BMI-PGS built in the training dataset explained 38.9%. All benchmarked PGS based on BMI showed a significant relationship with mean-over-time %EBWL. These findings highlight the potential of BMI PGS in predicting weight loss after bariatric surgery and support their use as promising tools to improve the effectiveness of future antiobesity treatments.

Authors

Bastien Vallée Marcotte, Juan de Toro-Martín, André Tchernof, Louis Pérusse, Simon Marceau, Marie-Claude Vohl

×

Figure 4

Linear relationship between polygenic risk scores (PGS) and excess body weight loss (%EBWL).

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Linear relationship between polygenic risk scores (PGS) and excess body ...
(A–D) Associations with mean-over-time %EBWL (mean %EBWL), and (E–H) associations with %EBWL at the end of follow-up (end %EBWL). Panels represent individual PGS: (A and E) PGSTRAIN, (B and F) PGSBMI, (C and G) PGSLOCKE, and (D and H) PGSKHERA. Points represent individual participants and are colored according to %EBWL response group (low, average, and high). Solid lines indicate fitted linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, presurgery BMI, surgery type, and the first 10 principal components of population structure, with shaded areas denoting 95% CIs. Reported r2 and P values correspond to the association between each PGS and %EBWL.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts