Usage Information
Abstract
Skeletal muscle is composed of heterogeneous myofiber types and non-myocyte populations. Myopathies occur in many diseases, but mechanisms driving these pathologies remain largely unknown, partly because conventional approaches cannot link histopathological features to molecular states at single-fiber resolution. To address this challenge, we brought histopathology and spatial transcriptomics together by applying high-resolution Seq-Scope technology to a mouse model of mTORC1 hyperactivation. Cross-sections from extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus (SOL), two muscles with distinct fiber-type compositions, were profiled to determine how transcriptome changes are linked to histopathological outcomes. mTORC1 hyperactivation elicited distinct, fiber-type-dependent pathological programs. Type I and IIa fibers were largely resistant to mTORC1-induced pathology, exhibiting relatively limited morphological alterations. In contrast, type IIx fibers diverged into opposing fates: in SOL, they underwent abnormal enlargement associated with sustained growth signaling, cytoskeletal remodeling, and impaired proteostasis; in EDL, they developed basophilia associated with increased RNA content and lipid, oxidative, and nucleotide metabolism-related signatures. Within EDL, type IIb fibers displayed heterogeneity with discrete transcriptional states. Non-myocytic populations, including macrophages and fibroblasts, accumulated preferentially in SOL, forming a fibrotic microenvironment associated with inflammation, remodeling, and hypertrophy. These findings provide a link between histopathological phenotypes and molecular states at single-fiber resolution.
Authors
Jer-En Hsu, Qingyang Zhao, Weiqiu Cheng, Hyun Min Kang, Susan V. Brooks, Myungjin Kim, Jun Hee Lee
Usage data is cumulative from August 2026 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 56 | 0 |
| 19 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 7 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 14 | 0 |
| Totals | 96 | 0 |
| Total Views | 96 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
